I just bought a 4 pack of Reebok brand stretchable boxer shorts and discovered that they have no hole in the front to pee through! I returned them to the store and checked the 3 or 4 other brands and they were all the same - no pee hole. The clerk wasn’t aware of this until I pointed it out to her. Are these made for women? One of the perks of being a boy is to pee without getting half undressed. Why would anyone make them this way and more importantly why would anyone buy them?
Fashion doesn’t car if you can pee. Just so long as you can highlight your package.
If I’ve learned one thing on the dope over the past ten years, it’s that we really have no idea about how other people pee.
Some men pee sitting down. Some men don’t ever use the hole in their underwear for peeing. Some men pee outside whenever possible. We have lots of threads about bathroom habits. All are very illuminating.
But, these boxers were probably designed for women.
Most men dont use the pee slot, actually. That factoid was on Wait Wait last week or so.
You can pull the top down a little or pull the leg hole over.
From threads we’ve had in the past, including this one with a poll, some Dopers do and some don’t.
Right, you can go through the gate or you can go over the fence. Either way works.
What’s interesting in that poll was that, of those who replied:
- Most who wear boxers use the fly
- Most who wear briefs or boxer briefs don’t
When I answered that poll, nine years ago, my answer was “briefs/fly”; that’s now changed to “briefs/over the top.” I changed brands in the intervening years (from Hanes to Adidas), and most of the Adidas ones don’t have a fly. However, I now prefer flyless, anyway, as I discovered that they fit better.
I agree, they fit better. Also it’s not as thick and sweaty with one layer of fabric rather than the two with a fly.
“pee hole”?
I prefer my boxer briefs with no “wiener hole”.
By “stretchable boxer shorts” the OP almost certainly means boxer briefs, and given the brand and description, probably ones designed with athletic support in mind. In my experience about half of this type of underwear have a flap and half don’t. But I’m an “over the fence” guy so it doesn’t concern me.
Is that what it is called? Pee slot? heh-heh I have both types of garments but I find the ones without are more comfortable.
No, I am an over-the-top man. The slot is too small for me, and pushing/pulling things thru seems like a time waster (not to mention all the additional handling/contact).
Nice not-so-stealth brag, big man. 
I thought everyone just used the leg hole. It’s so much easier that way.
Paying very little attention to fashion, and buying underwear about as often as I do a new car, I am semi-astonished by this thread. Only “semi”, however, as I just talked to a friend who complained that his wife bought him new underwear “with no cock hole”. I kinda thought his wife bought him factory rejects. I had no idea there is men’s underwear without a fly. It goes without saying that I am not an over or around or pull down user.
I haven’t worn underwear with a “pee slot” (I like that expression) for over 30 years. I only wear briefs or boxer briefs, and they all come without a fly. If I think of briefs with a fly, I think ofsomething like this which is grandpa style IMHO, though I’m old enough to be a grandpa…
An implied (but not explicitly stated) question in the OP is: What, if any, brands DO have a pee fly? And no responding post has addressed that?
What, am I the only Doper still alive who wears underwear with a fly?
The answer is: Jockey brand underwear does. There are several styles, from low-rise to medium-rise and bikini style to choose from. (The “rise” seems to refer to how high up on your waist the waistband sits.) I’m not sure if there is a “boxer” style, but I think there is. At least several years ago I had such a style.
This just proves what I have always believed: that there is something deeply wrong with people who wear boxers.
I’m an over-the-top man myself and I honestly could not tell you whether or not my briefs have a fly.
I mean I could but I don’t want to check right here in the middle of the office.
Warning! If your underwear does not have a pee slot, whether you would use it or not, then you are wearing panties!
Bill, is that you?
A coworker brought up this same subject in the men’s room at work yesterday. He was irritated because his new undies have no pee slot/hole.
That’s exactly my thinking, as well. I even told my buddy who complained about his wife buying him underwear without a cock hole that she must have wanted to see him in panties.