NO, I’m not getting kicked to the curb by my fiance (uh . . . I don’t think). So there will be no pissy or heart-wrenching anecdotes here. But we’ve got a running hypothetical argument going about whether or not he would get this here ring back if we were ever to split up.
(Note: So far our discussion only extends to the possibility of splitting up before we get hitched.)
I say that if I do the dumping, or the breakup was caused by actions on my part that would clearly constitute a (previously-known) deal-breaking offense (such as cheating on him), then yeah, I should hand over the ring. (On the other hand, if I didn’t know in advance that he considered, say, wearing a candy necklace to church grounds for breakup, then it could go either way.)
But if, say, he decides he’d rather be doing the horizontal hula with Susie at the office, and dumps me to be with her, I say the rock is MINE.
He says that because he gave me the ring as a symbol of our agreement to marry each other (and because I accepted it as such), then if that agreement is broken for ANY reason, he gets the ring back.
Or he’ll take me to court.
I say by the time the case comes up, I will have considered it merely a “gift from an ex” (which implied no specific agreement of any sort), pawned it and spent the money on a trip to Hawaii with Greg Allman.
Anyway, it’s Friday, I’m bored, and so . . .
. . . where do you all weigh in on this one (I’m not asking for legal opinions–I guess this is more of an ethics poll)?
And are we weird because we like to bicker (light-heartedly) about this?