There was always a reason in the script. It’s not a major problem for me because it’s a drama, after all. I’m just pointing out that by the end, ‘get on your knees, I’m going to shoot you in the head right now-’ ‘Wait!’ became a little bit of a Breaking Bad trademark.
I really didn’t see that coming. You think Todd knew Groucho was Jewish?
And the hitmen, even if they were real, would never know the difference. That’s probably be the smartest thing Gretchen and Elliott could do other than calling the cops right away.
He’s not only merely dead…
Fair enough. I think it’s hard to take his comments any other way, but he didn’t directly say he’d keep the money. He pointed out to Walt that it would be foolish to believe him if he promised to bring the money to Walt’s family.
Yes. He said he liked the finale of The Sopranos for that show but Breaking Bad required a different type of ending. Speaking of which, I mentioned something about The X Files a week or two ago and Martin Bigfoot said this:
On Talking Bad Vince Gilligan made some comments about shows that never resolve anything and don’t tie up the loose ends, and he certainly didn’t say anything that made it obvious he was talking about The X Files, but it was easy to interpret it that way. He said he didn’t want to go that route.
Right, I’m pretty sure it’s money laundering no matter how you slice it. It’s the proceeds from a criminal enterprise and I doubt they would be the first people to use a charity to launder money. The Schwartzes may very well have the means to pull it off since their net worth is in the hundreds of millions and could be in the billions, and if they got nervous they could even make the donation themselves without ever touching Walt’s money. Strictly speaking I don’t know if Gretchen and Elliott created a charity themselves to fund those clinics or if they just have a charitable foundation and used it to give $28 million to rehab clinics (maybe Jesse will work at one one day if he hasn’t left the Southwest entirely). If it’s the latter, maybe nobody would know. If it’s the former it would raise a lot of questions.
He stole a car and drove back to the cabin.
It didn’t leave the same kind of impression on me either. It couldn’t, really. By this episode everything that was going to happen had already been set in motion. You couldn’t predict everything (I sure didn’t) but there was an inevitability to most of it. That’s why the little things like Walt’s scene with Skyler stood out to me more than the plot points did.
So did I. They’re in a pretty remote area but that was a lot of machine gun fire.
Yes, she was. And she went to the coffee place to talk business. She met Walt there every week and she kept doing the same with Todd. That’s how Walt knew he would find them there. I thought it was established that the finished meth was shipped from one place to another with legitimate Madrigal products, but I could be wrong.
If Walt told Todd he’d poisoned Lydia it’s hard to think of a real reason Todd wouldn’t just kill him instantly.
There are a couple I still haven’t read or seen but Breaking Bad is the most like Macbeth for sure: they’re about ostensibly good men who go bad and have to grapple with the consequences. Last night I was trying to think of a Shakespearean tragedy that ends like Breaking Bad did and I couldn’t. Macbeth goes through an emotional cycle somewhere between Walt’s and Jesse’s; he’s haunted by what he’s done and gives up when he realizes his enemies and the prophecy have him cornered. If not for Walt’s dealing with the Schwartzes - depending on how you believe that might turn out after Walt dies - I think you could say the ending is Macbeth-y. (Macbeth has no descendants and near the end he despairs that he’s given up his soul so someone else’s children can take the throne.) Richard III and Iago never give up - Richard dies on the battlefield, sort of like Walt - but they’re knowingly, maybe flamboyantly evil. Walt wasn’t that.