And to respond to the OP, no, I don’t think it’s mutilation. www.dictionary.com defines mutilation as:
Breast implants do not deprive a woman of an essential part, disfigure by damaging irreparably - unless it’s a botched surgery. It could be argued that breast implants do “make imperfect by . . . altering parts”, but that is individual tastes.
I’ve never been tempted to have implants. I have enough for myself, and could probably donate to other women, if that were an option. However, I’m not going to pass any sort of judgement on a woman who gets them. Our own Michelle has discussed her implants in MPSIMS, and she hardly strikes me as a woman with self-esteem issues or an inability to have healthy relationships. Making a blanket assumption of that sort insults individual women you may know nothing about.
Breast implantation isn’t necessarily about trying to live up to an unrealistic standard of feminine beauty (though I think there’s a lot of that). It can be just one more version of body alteration that includes piercing, scarrification, tattooing and other forms of permanent, cosmetic change. Those practices have existed since before recorded history, and will continue to exist so long as individuals have control over their bodies. We’re not so far removed from our ancestors as we like to think.