My local library provides internet access free of charge. There is one day a week they have various classes, but every other day of the week you’re allowed at least an hour of access and, if there is no one waiting for a machine, you can stay on all day.
So no, you don’t need an “account” requiring money to pay for internet access. There are e-mail services available for free. Some people are posting on the SDMB without need of paying for the privilege.
Yahoo gives you a dialer to sign on with and software for a browser? I’ve had Yahoo email addresses, but since I’ve also always had a pay-for isp account, I’ve never had Yahoo offer me a way to get email or surf the web for free.
Oh, then you were describing something rather rare, if not unknown. How often would someone who had no internet access other than the library join a message board such as SDMB?
One then? Out of how many people that call themselves poor yet are still paying for internet access? Do you not understand how frustrating this sort of thing is?
Me for one, the first 3 years I was a member I used the Library as I couldn’t afford a computer of my own. Also most Libraries don’t charge for a card unless you live out of their taxing area.
Right/ Because advocating that those on food stamps deserve anything other than non-flavored nutrient rich protein slurry is making people on welfare into heroes.
And remember, if you’re on assistance, don’t you dare pay the extra $0.35 for vanilla slurry. Flavors are for welfare queens.
Actually, I’d like you to do that. Let me know how many food stampers you see buying shiny rims or lottery tickets. I’m going to guess that it’s a very small number of those on welfare, but I’ll wait to see your results first.
Frankly, I don’t, and I don’t see how any intelligent person could. Do you think poor people should not have phones? The best way to get out of poverty would be to find a better job, or to learn more about the world so that you could imagine other ways of making a living than you currently are. I wish more of my tax money went to getting internet access for poor people.
Oh, thank God curlcoat showed up. I was just thinking, jeez, we haven’t had a good 40-page flamefest for a while. What shall we do about this? And then, like manna from the heavens, curlcoat arrives to spew her logic-free babbling inflammatory nonsense into this thread!
My prediction is about 5-6 pages of people trying to reason with curlcoat about just how wrong-headed her cruel and stupid assumptions about life are. Gradually, the more rational and reasonable members of the board will realize this is a lost cause and will abandon ship, leaving a few die-hards here shouting into the empty whirling blackness that is curlcoat’s brain, until either the SDMB finally shuts down permanently or the heat-death of the universe occurs, whichever comes first.
So you andRand Rover are now claiming that you’ve been lurking since 1999, but only joined in September 2008? And both of you just so happen to post in exactly the same kinds of threads, both claim to be lawyers, and both post using almost exactly the same language (and thought patterns)?
Not really, but I’m not willing to take the full blame for that. Communication is a two-way street, and I feel that you’ve done a very poor job of communicating the source of your frustration.
I’m not advocating that you try again, of course. I suspect that the rewards of understanding your frustration would be outweighed by the pain-in-the-ass mind-bending I’d have to subject myself to in order to achieve it. I’ll accept full responsibility for losing interest, though.
I can think of five examples, including myself for a period, to my certain knowledge. As you enjoy spending the disability check my and their taxes paid for while sneering at them, do the math.
No, Leesha. She’s entitled to what recreational activities she can have. And, presuming her story to be true, she deserves to draw disability. What she does not deserve is to live off the taxes of others while denouncing programs that help others in similar but not identical situations. That is hypocrisy.