Bricker fooled me for too long

[Really_Not_All_That_Bright]

@VinylTurnip

Don’t forget “the word ‘marriage’ is SACRED! You can’t just go around changing what words mean!”

I lump that in with the “God told me so” stuff.

[elucidator]

Perhaps more to the point is how so many female scientists hide their gender by using their initials to indicate their authorship of scientific papers. “J.K. Jones”, say, rather than “Jane”. The presumption being that male scientists are more likely to take a paper seriously if they don’t know the author is female. I think they are probably right, though I have no idea how to prove that. Scientifically.

[control-z]

I just want to say hang in there Bricker. I don’t have the time or desire to argue conservative thinking to the 95% liberal SDMB, but I hope you keep doing it. It never hurts them to hear opposing viewpoints.

You would think you’d be safe linking to a real news outlet, but as most of us have found out, you can’t believe everything you read even when it’s from reputable sources. Doesn’t mean unions are squeaky clean.

[Hamlet]

@elucidator

Perhaps more to the point is how so many female scientists hide their gender by using their initials to indicate their authorship of scientific papers. “J.K. Jones”, say, rather than “Jane”. The presumption being that male scientists are more likely to take a paper seriously if they don’t know the author is female. I think they are probably right, though I have no idea how to prove that. Scientifically.

Great point.

• H. Amlet

[MsWhatsit]

@Bricker

My point is that others, more politically aligned with the majority here, also post obvious bullshit and are still treated fine. So I am suggesting that merely posting “obvious bullshit” is not the sin that’s causing the poor treatment.

Boo fucking hoo. What do you want, a cookie and a glass of milk? It’s a tough old world out there and the amount of shit that people receive for saying stupid bullshit is not equitable. Rather than trying to fix the overall shit reception imbalance in the world, you might try simply saying less stupid bullshit. That’s just a suggestion, mind.

[prodicus]

Maybe I’m crazy, but I don’t see John Mace as a “conservative poster”, he strikes me as very centrist, and I see it as a sign of how left this board is that he is often cited as a conservative.

ETA: Also, count me among Bricker’s supporters - not that anyone cares!

-prodicus, Canadian lefty

[Vita_Beata]

@control-z

I just want to say hang in there Bricker. I don’t have the time or desire to argue conservative thinking to the 95% liberal SDMB, but I hope you keep doing it. It never hurts them to hear opposing viewpoints.

You would think you’d be safe linking to a real news outlet, but as most of us have found out, you can’t believe everything you read even when it’s from reputable sources. Doesn’t mean unions are squeaky clean.

Ditto this. I love reading Bricker’s calm and measured, instructional posts. Fool us some more, Bricker!

[MsWhatsit]

I am not anti-Bricker, I am just anti-whining, and also anti-stupid bullshit. Why does this have to be some kind of ridiculous pro-Bricker/anti-Bricker camp thing? Not everything has to be a god damned football game.

I think I should probably not be on the Internet today.

[Left_Hand_of_Dorkness]

@MsWhatsit

Boo fucking hoo. What do you want, a cookie and a glass of milk? It’s a tough old world out there and the amount of shit that people receive for saying stupid bullshit is not equitable. Rather than trying to fix the overall shit reception imbalance in the world, you might try simply saying less stupid bullshit. That’s just a suggestion, mind.

Again, rather than scolding the rest of us for not coming down on what he sees as bullshit, Bricker needs to come down on what he sees as bullshit. The amount of time spent complaining over the lack of equity would be far better spent in creating equity.

[John_Mace]

@prodicus

Maybe I’m crazy, but I don’t see John Mace as a “conservative poster”, he strikes me as very centrist, and I see it as a sign of how left this board is that he is often cited as a conservative.

We libertarians are often confused with conservatives on this MB. And sometimes even as :eek: centrists!

I have a lot of very left-leaning views, but I’d like to see us get rid of the Minimum Wage, too. Ain’t nothin’ “centrist” about that!

Maybe we could all stop trying to label each other and just, you know, deal with each issue as it comes up?

You many now return to your regularly scheduled Bricker Bashing.

[Bricker]

@Left_Hand_of_Dorkness

Again, rather than scolding the rest of us for not coming down on what he sees as bullshit, Bricker needs to come down on what he sees as bullshit. The amount of time spent complaining over the lack of equity would be far better spent in creating equity.

No, that’s not possible; I could spend eight hours per day trying to create equity precisely because there’s a boatload of outspoken liberals and very few conservatives.

And, indeed, why isn’t this plea for a more reasoned approach also considered an attempt to create equity?

[Rand_Rover]

@MsWhatsit

Boo fucking hoo. What do you want, a cookie and a glass of milk? It’s a tough old world out there and the amount of shit that people receive for saying stupid bullshit is not equitable. Rather than trying to fix the overall shit reception imbalance in the world, you might try simply saying less stupid bullshit. That’s just a suggestion, mind.

You keep missing the point --it’s not about Bricker, it’s about the majority of SDMB posters. They see themselves as fair and impartial adjudicators of truth, but their behavior shows them simply to be partisan hacks. When this is pointed out, they don’t even respond directly, they justly repeatedly fail to see the point and think the conservatives are just whining.

[Bricker]

@Really_Not_All_That_Bright

Oh, I don’t know. At this point, I am willing to say, with certainty, that there are no arguments against legalizing SSM that don’t boil down to “ewww, buttsecks”, or “God told me so.” It is, in effect, as close to being a scientific truth as one could reasonably hope to find (given certain other assumptions that are universally held, like marriage being a fundamental right, and so on).

Having said that, you don’t post anti-SSM screeds, having accepted (for yourself) the liberal position on the issue, so maybe this is of limited relevance.

Yes. I agree with this position.

[Euphonious_Polemic]

@Left_Hand_of_Dorkness

Again, rather than scolding the rest of us for not coming down on what he sees as bullshit, Bricker needs to come down on what he sees as bullshit. The amount of time spent complaining over the lack of equity would be far better spent in creating equity.

Agree.

But sometimes it’s more fun to cry “not faaaairrr!” like a 12 year old.

[MsWhatsit]

@Rand_Rover

You keep missing the point --it’s not about Bricker, it’s about the majority of SDMB posters. They see themselves as fair and impartial adjudicators of truth, but their behavior shows them simply to be partisan hacks. When this is pointed out, they don’t even respond directly, they justly repeatedly fail to see the point and think the conservatives are just whining.

Why do you give two shits what other people see themselves as? I could make up all sorts of fascinating scenarios about how you see yourself, and some of them might even be accurate, but I fail to see how this would be relevant to any sort of legitimate discussion on here.

Don’t post stupid bullshit and stop whining when you’ve been told that you posted stupid bullshit. Job done.

[Rand_Rover]

@Euphonious_Polemic

But sometimes it’s more fun to cry “not faaaairrr!” like a 12 year old.

The sum total of your political position is “crying not fair like a 12 year old.”

[Rand_Rover]

@MsWhatsit

Why do you give two shits what other people see themselves as? I could make up all sorts of fascinating scenarios about how you see yourself, and some of them might even be accurate, but I fail to see how this would be relevant to any sort of legitimate discussion on here.

Don’t post stupid bullshit and stop whining when you’ve been told that you posted stupid bullshit. Job done.

Keep missing the point, see if I care. The SDMB liberals are ignorant about themselves and I’m fighting that ignorance (with very little success) .

[Robot_Arm]

@Bricker

Yes, let’s be clear. The “said nothing” should really be, “said nothing particularly vilifying or traducing.” The responses to BG definitely pointed out the factual inaccuracy, but the tone was dramatically different. It’s that difference that led me to ask for observers to compare and contrast the two.

That may be how you see it; Rand is still clinging to a variation of his “said nothing” claim.

@Rand_Rover

That is not as impressive a response as you seem to believe. The liberals here crow over and over about how they are unbiased seekers of truth in this godforsaken world, then those two threads come along and show them to be hacks. In Bricker s thread, they got on him ostensibly for not having due regard for the truth, but then they don’t say a word when one of their own does the exact same thing. That clearly shows their true feelings on the matter and completely kills any claims to being simple objective nonpartisan truth seekers.

(Bolding mine.)

[Euphonious_Polemic]

@Rand_Rover

The sum total of your political position is “crying not fair like a 12 year old.”

I’m sorry, but citing Rubber vs. Glue is not a rational response.

[bup]

@control-z

I just want to say hang in there Bricker. I don’t have the time or desire to argue conservative thinking to the 95% liberal SDMB, but I hope you keep doing it. It never hurts them to hear opposing viewpoints.

Yes! I can read Bricker’s posts without wanting to stab something! The other conservatives that haven’t gone running off tend to be brainless, or trolls.