Bryan Ekers, you are a thread-pissing dumbfuck

On the index page of every forun, the number of replies to each listed thread is a hyperlink. If you click it, it opens a page with that info. You can get the URL for that page in various ways, depending on your browser. In Firefox, right-click it and select Page Info.

For the last time, how is adding an extra letter and an extra punctiation mark a typo?

Hell, it’s not even an error.

It’s a mistyping, hence a typo. I already cited the fuckin’ dictionary, you recalcitrant moron.

I’m pretty sure it’s already been sufficiently played out in this thread alone. It’s no different than the attitude of the stereotypical class clown who likes to get a good laugh from the crowd, something I’ve enjoyed doing since childhood. I’m sure even the people who write textbooks would find it too banal to make it a textbook case.

Well, if you feel I’ve crossed any lines inappropriate to GD, I invite you to report my posts to the moderators. I personally think I’ve been much more polite than you or your views deserve but I’m constrained by GD rules. Thus at the end of the day, and in fact for all days in the near future, I’m still one of those skeptics. Take whatever action you see fit.

Well, I’m proud of some of them (many are pretty obvious and forgettable, or just pop-culture references from Simpsons and elsewhere), and I have no control over what you find funny, so I have no reason to care about this particular complaint.

So you go out of your way to post nonsense. Somehow, I’m not surprised.

The dictionary is nonsense?

No, posting you’re instead of your is nonsense. Are you eight years old?

Nope, don’t think you ever crossed such lines. Just made posting for me and others on those topics so unpleasant, unfun, and generally unedifying that now nor I nor others of my viewpoint bother.

And this is what makes you a dick: The belief that people of a certain set of viewpoints don’t deserve respect, and you can be as nasty as the rules allow because it’s your right.

I already have: I don’t post on “paranormal” topics any more. Neither does anyone else, except for an occasional guest.

Apparently you have little control over what anyone finds funny.

Not all dictionaries say the same thing.

(bolding mine)

Dude, people post you’re for your and there for their and so on all the time. Tell me you’re not really this big a tool, huh?

God, what fuckin’ tooldom.

You invited it by insinuating M-W is the Dictionary.

Respect is earned. If you come on a board like this one and spout a bunch of new age mumbo jumbo or talk about paranormal bullshit without overwhelming evidence…or even any real grasp of logic or really the scientific method…then you have to be prepared to be ridiculed. Or at least very uncomfortable when everyone starts piling on. Why you would single out Bryan on this point is beyond me…this board gives short shrift to that kind of crap. One of the main reasons I like it so much.

Probably a wise decision…unless you come in with either a very good arguement or a lot of evidence. That said, its still an interesting topic sometimes. Hell, I even started a paranormal thread in GD on Bigfoot once. :stuck_out_tongue: The spanking I received was fairly mild…but then I went into the thread being pretty much a skeptic on the whole subject to start with.

Humor is one of those things that strikes people differently. For instance I find Bryan quite amusing. He has a very dry wit that IMHO gives character to many of the threads he does his famous drive bys in. :wink:

-XT

-XT

I sure didn’t. And your own cites don’t in any way refute what I said.

Next thing you’ll be telling me is that “it’s” for “its” isn’t a typo either.

Yes, you did. “I already cited the fuckin’ dictionary…” M-W isn’t the dictionary, it is a dictionary.

No? “There’s no qualifications such as ‘only one mistyped letter, etc.’” Those certainly look like qualifications to me.

Uh huh. It couldn’t be that, like on most boards, that human nature prevails and people do an excellent job of driving away people who are unlike themselves. Nah, couldn’t be.

Every New Ager here has been banned, suspended, or beaten into silence. Quite a coincidence. Not one was worthy of full participation in this august forum! On the other hand, no skeptic has ever been chastised here for his lack of understanding the scientific method or failure to grasp logic.

Because if you are a good skeptic and atheist here, you “get it” overall, and that’s good enough.

It’s board politics, pure and simple. And I think this board, in light of its purported dedication to “fighting ignorance,” has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that no group of people is really capable of politely tolerating a strong minority of dissenters in its midst.

He was in the same old attack mode in the Wilson thread, even though the topic was philosophy and he obviously was totally out of depth in discussing it.

But the going assumption is that, hey, we’re skeptics, and we can pronounce on anything, cuz we’re just generally right, yuh know?

And since New Agers will never meet your arbitrary standards on the matter, they will always be driven away. And what fun it is to mock and ostracize people! We wish there were more of them to torment, as there were in the good old days. And bannings were ever so much more fun than suspensions!

Quite right, your orthodoxy saved you.

SnakeSpirit was the only poster who could ever make me laugh out loud, and I’ve pretty much given up on the board being any good since his banning. This thread demonstrates that the board is in its neutron star phase: Just a bunch of dense invalidators are left, whose only energy output comes from continuing contraction.

Just out of curiosity, on behalf of what “others” are you speaking? SnakeSpirit? He got banned through no action of mine. Rather, he torpedoed himself, shortly after he tried pitting me and glee, with both threads turning into train-wrecks (though glee’s was far more spectacular).

By that definition, this board is full of dicks, including yourself. It’s not a specific enough accusation to carry any weight, though at least you acknowledge that I’m operating within the rules (I do get the occasional warning, but not often and not recently).

I consider that something of a victory for a board dedicated to fighting ignorance. You get no sympathy from me, considering the vast number of websites that would be friendly and welcoming of your views.

This makes no sense. Does anyone have any control over what others find funny? I suppose one could be sufficiently preachy and convince others that certain topics are specifically not funny, but beyond that, I don’t know what mechanism of “control” could exist.

Dude, you’re a retard! Again we’re talking about regular colloquial speech:

Human: “I looked it up in the dictionary.”
Moron: “Not the dictionary–a dictionary! One among many!”

Dude, are saying that there is an official casuistry of typographical errors out there that I’ve missed? We’ve obvious got some different definitions in our dictionaries, so are you the Typo Pope or what?

You expect anyone whose chief means of verbally defending himself is “tool” to make sense?