It’s a shame that VS didn’t stick to their guns and tell the busybody coalition to piss off. Moral deficit, my ass. These same repressive assholes trying to place everything that’s the slightest bit sexual under a burlap sack are obtuse to the reality that their own kids are going to fuck like rabid bunnies no matter whether VS sells hot undies or not. I swear, the candy asses and crybabies are ruining things for everyone. :fuck em and feed em fishheads smiley:
I arrived early for my lunch meeting at Tyson’s today, so I took a stroll over to the Victoria’s Secret … I wish I’d seen the original window, because what they have now is bo-ring. 
I think VS could resolve this without compromising their – ahem – positions, by arranging the mannequins so that they’re oriented to be best-viewed from within the store. Their nahsty behinds, now turned toward the windows, could be hidden from the halls of commerce by, say, a narrow (~footandahalf) wall, maybe covered in some provocative velvet or something. Arrange things so that the shopper in the halls has a good side-view of whatever the small wall is masking, but Mrs. Jesus Johnson isn’t granted enough to complain about without very, very obviously having to crane her neck to find it.
After all this brouhaha about it, that store would be packed.
I wouldn’t protest VS for their provacative displays and wispy bits of lacy undies, I would protest them because there isn’t anything in their store that a real woman ( y’know, size 10 and up) can actually wear without looking like a water buffalo with a wedgie.)
The only thing I can wear from VS is their body lotion, and that gives me a headache.
I’m left feeling both confused…and engorged…
They’ll get those mannequins when they pry them from my cold, dead, fing …
Lemme rethink that …
What the fucking hell?
I could have sworn that Milwaukee and Wisconsin were both very progressive when I moved away back in 1999.
The damned state nearly went Red and now this? Has it changed so much in the last six years?
-Joe