But February made me shiver - (mini rants)

I share your opinion and frustration.

It’s a multi-player Prisoner’s Dilemma experiment: the best for everyone would be for decent ads to be served to willing viewers, thereby financing good content.
The “defect” option for the user is the ad blocker. The “defect” option for the content owner is to serve up crappy ads.

If you cooperate, by lowering your shields for a website, they bombard you with crap.
If a website cooperates, by serving decent ads, many people will block their ads anyway.

I always feel used and betrayed when a website asks me to turn off my ad blocker and then shows me crap. And they all seem to say the same thing: “We get it, you don’t like ads…” but they really don’t get it: I don’t want crappy ads that take over my browser and bog down my machine and make the content unbearable.

Today we have a winner in the category of “Most Passive-Aggressive E-Mail Spammer” - the Swanson vitamin company.

I made the mistake of buying one of their products online, only to be deluged with at least daily promos for various “specials”. I went to their unsubscribe link and was given these choices:

  • Send me all offers so I can pick the ones that work best for me
    Send me three offers a week
    Send me two offers a week
    Send me just one offer a week
    Don’t send me any offers –I’ll pay full price*

I picked “I’d rather die prematurely than have to wade through any more of your spam”. :mad:

Friend just announced he and his husband are getting a divorce (his second in less than five years).

Quick backstory - he was in a long term relationship before gay marriage was legal. They were deeply committed, cohabiting and whatnot. Shortly after they break up (within months), he announces he’s engaged to someone else. (The writing was on the wall that gay marriage was gonna be legalized.)

A few months after that, he announces that he and his fiancee are having a friend serve as a surrogate, and they are expecting.

3-4 years later, they get a divorce, and sure enough, a few months later, he announces he’s engaged again. Meanwhile, there is little (if any) record that the first marriage existed. If you went through his social media posts, you’d swear he was a single father up through the second engagement.

Well, (IIRC) another 3-4 years later, and he’s announcing divorce #2.

The part that I’m ranting about is how he’s pseudo-militant about equal rights, and has engaged in numerous debates against those who don’t believe that gays should be parents, get married, etc. They talk about how it is against family values, gays don’t respect the sanctity of marriage, etc.

So, this is just going to give those bigots more ammunition in their challenges, stating that if one of the staunchest supporters of equal rights had two divorces within a span of five years, how can he say that he respects the value of marriage.

(And it’s not that he is getting divorced - people change and grow apart. It’s the quick turnover of these relationships. I know it’s a double standard, but when it comes to equal rights, my conservative friends have a double-standard, where it’s okay for a straight person to have this background, but when a gay guy does, it shows that he doesn’t take the idea of marriage seriously. It’s a “work twice as hard to get half as far” kind of thing.)

I just really hope he takes some time to focus on being single for a while.

I just realized last night that I can’t eat Cheetos anymore. Because of Trump. Every time I look at a bag of Cheetos I think of all the people calling him “Cheeto [Insert name here]” and I don’t want them anymore.

I used to love them, too. :frowning:

If it helps, you can tell anyone who criticizes that he’s still doing better than my grandma did. She was first married in 1930. If she didn’t do marriage in, I’m pretty sure it can survive a few more feckless folks.

Even with an ad blocker and script blocker running, our local news station’s website is so clogged with crap that it causes the browser on my mom’s brand new MacBook to briefly freeze. The worst offenders on the site appear to be a “service” called Antenna that sprinkles little ‘reaction’ icons throughout the text (that you inevitably mouse over while reading the article), and INSTANT SAVINGS circulars that pop up when your mouse pointer gets close enough. I’ve yet to figure out a way to fully block either one.

So your conservative friends have a double standard, but you’re the one pitting your friend. You don’t have a double standard, oh no, it’s just them. Right.

Wanker.

Right, Calatin, your friend may have issues that he’s trying to work through, but he never signed up to be the poster boy for same-sex marriage. He’s just a guy trying to live his life as best he can, making the same mistakes as many other people. And the bigots will say what they say regardless of what he does. Are you his friend or one of the bigots? It’s hard to tell.

It’s that he puts himself up as the ideal, showing that homosexuals can be in long-term, committed relationships, yet he goes through them like toilet-paper. It’s the hypocrisy.

And, Panache, he actually does. He literally uses his relationship (whichever at the time) as showing that all gay men aren’t frivolous, hormone-driven animals with no thought towards a long game, and that they are capable of entering into committed, thoughtful long-term relationships.

Getting engaged months after a divorce? Not quite the best example to put forth.

March on over for another month of mini-rants

Oops, I somehow missed the Forward, March! thread.Here.

I like your thread title better. :frowning: