Customarily, the titles “Ambassador” and “Governor” remain attached to the holder, even after they have left office. Thus, George Aiken, who served in the US Senate for some thirty years, was, after his retirement, referred to as “Governor Aiken”, even though he only served four years as Governor in the early part of his career. Similarly, Elliot Richardson, who occupied nearly every possible position in Washington at one time or another, was always referred to as “Ambassador Richardson”.
This custom is not always followed, but you typically see Bill Clinton referred to as “Mr. Clinton”, and not “President Clinton”.
From what I’ve been reading, Governor is incorrect as a title for her because there is already a governor of Alaska that isn’t her. Whereas a former senator can continue to be known as senator because there are many current senators.
But she quit! It would be different, I feel, if she had been elected as vp, but she wasn’t. She no longer wanted the job the people gave to her, so she threw up her hands and said “I quit”.
That’s not very honorable imo.
Peace,
mangeorge
Him too. Tho he didn’t really have a choice. To be honest, I wouldn’t put Palin in the same class as Nixon. She’s just silly and not too sharp. Nixon’s a crook.
Clinton stuck it out.
Nixon did not quit. He was going to get impeached. Palin is the" quitinator". She left everybody who voted for her hanging in the wind because she saw an opportunity to make a lot of money. That is the worst thing a politician can do, unless graft and murder are on the table.
Yeah, so he was going to get impeached…and he resigned. Clinton was impeached and did not quit. Sure, Nixon would have been convicted as well, but he still quit.
The thing is, Nixon at least had a legitimate reason to quit. Heck, you could say he saved the taxpayers money and congress a bunch of time by not allowing the impeachment process to continue. It’s still more noble than just up and quitting.
Also, I believe that President is one of those titles that goes away now.