If Fox has lost their Audience of One, maybe they’ll just say “fuckit…let’s actually report the news.” Millions of cases of cognitive dissonance result in massive epidemic of cranial explosions.
If FOX went off the air tomorrow, their watchers would assume the wind stopped blowing, and blame it on Hillary.
Dopey Donald flies into a panic as the stock market belly-flops:
‘When in danger, or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!’
This one is a beaut:
Google manipulated votes. What the fuck does that even mean? Nevermind, it’s Trump, it’s more meaningless nonsense for the morons.
Searching even the Judicial Watch website brings up no mention of this, so, who knows?
Yikes. The man continues to amaze. Not in a good way.
I just did a quick search. The guy he cites – Robert Epstein - has been claiming for years that Google’s biased search engines could swing undecided voters in a preselected way (he implies toward Hillary). Google (and lots of other people) dispute this, of course. But the claim isn’t that they interfered directly with votes, just that they influenced voters, who then “miscast” their votes.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/google-2016-election-121766
This isn’t even new news – he’s been saying this stuff for over five years.
Oh, that’s what he means by “manipulating votes”. And he doesn’t like it. Whether or not it’s true, then, wait until he finds out what Russia did! He’s gonna want to sue them, too!
This is scary because he will use this to gain support from his base to move forward with executive orders allowing him to control what is posted about so-called conservatives.
The brain-dead dumbshit will believe anything. I wonder how many Nigerian princes he’s helping recover their lost fortunes.
Hillary helpfully responds that the Google study was based on interviewing 21 people, noting for contexts sake that this is about half who have been indicted who worked on Trump’s campaign (or its behalf).
IRL equivalent of “my post is my cite.”
Well, shall we ban all political advertising, then? After all, that’s just a blatant attempt to manipulate votes…
Individual 1 tweets an image of a gigantic Trump Tower looming over Greenland and promises not to build one.
I dove into this last month when I saw someone post on Facebook when Ted Cruz was questioning this guy in the Senate. Turns out that what he’s against is Google’s policy to downrank non-credible sources of news, such as Infowars, Breitbart, WND, etc. He thinks that Google should have an algorithm that doesn’t do that, and by checking for factual accuracy, Google had helped Clinton and hurt Trump.
I can understand that there’s a concern about someone filtering my news feed. However, I want a news feed that down-ranks sites like Breitbart and Infowars.
So Trump is butt-hurt that Google is helping to inform voters who could otherwise be misinformed, and this helps Democrats. Huh.
And now, Jews who don’t vote for the party of White Nationalists, KKK, and Synagogue mass shootings are “disloyal.”
News flash: Fuck you.
…the President of the United States of America is a fucking imbecile. The stupidest man on the planet. A fucking troll. I had to triple check three times before posting this that this was real and not a parody account.
What does it mean that Google Search curates the news better than the news outlets?