No, the elimination of Individual Unemployability at retirement age is in the 2018 President’s Budget. Personally, I don’t think that provision will survive.
Who’s going to be sending the most insane tweets this week, big daddy orange or the trump tykes? The latter have started strong with “Democrats are not even people”.
Too bad bdo can’t be sent up for perjury or even making false official statements. His own tweets are evidence.
Truth.
1 of 11 Germans alive in 1939 were dead by 1945, and Hitler still had to remove himself from power. I don’t think that Trump will ever go below 30%, and it’s hard seeing him approach that number, even.
I can see people working in the administration believing that they may make a difference, or at least be a whistleblower or leaker, and those could be noble reasons to keep on in a trump admin. But, at this point, it is definitely time for those who do not have a particularly good reason to be loyal to trump himself to be evacuating the sinking shit.
Interesting tactic to keep employees in line. It is one thing to fire someone and leave them without an income with which to pay their bills.
This sets people up where not only do they need to worry about losing the jobs, but also their savings and could potentially put them into heavy debt.
Easy enough to justify. If I am firing you now, then you must have had poor performance in the past that you hid from me, or I would have fired you then.
If an employer is paying the bills for an employee’s private council, who is the lawyer actually working for? If they are being paid by the employer, then I would be concerned that protecting the employer would be their priority over the employee. I am not sure of the legality or the code of ethics take on it, but I do know that people are generally more loyal to those who are writing their paycheck than to those who aren’t.
“Eric Trump also called the recently elected Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez a “total whackjob,” then decried the increase in name-calling.” :rolleyes:
I take that as proof that the author of the story is smarter than the subject of the story. YMMV.
Because rejecting your political opponents’ humanity is somehow not hateful? “Yeah, those Democrats, well, they’re not even human. A kind of sub human race, really. Not kind, loving people like you and me.”
Yes, can’t we go to the halcyon days when conservatives showed great respect to Obama?
Golly, how I miss those fun, wild, carefree, and innocent times!
Trumpelthinskin has now wrestled his phone back from his keepers, and tweeted out a statement that Comey is a dirty rotten liar whose testimony has completely vindicated him.
It lacks a certain something, though. Like it was generated by an intelligence more artificial than Trump’s.
Much the same as what his “lawyer” (who managed to misspell president as “predisent”) said; Trump didn’t do anything wrong, and shame on Comey for telling everyone what Trump did wrong.
Here’s the full tweet:
No exclamation points? I’m dubious. Besides, there’s no way Trump could’ve extracted his thumbs from the Chinese finger trap this soon.
Listen, and understand! That Twittenator is out there! It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop… ever, until America is destroyed!
They don’t make finger traps that small, even for his thumbs. Don’t believe his lies.
So to Trump, concealing that he broke the law is paramount. Leakers are worse for actually informing on him, and he says that publicly. Doesn’t he get yet that every time he whines about leakers, it attracts more attention?
In Trump’s view, Deepthroat was the real villain of Watergate. And now another FBI source is going to take him down.
So he was cleared by someone who was lying? Like usual, anything remotely positive is to be taken as true, and anything negative as a lying lie by a lying liar.
Sane people know it’s the opposite.
That’s actually the only thing that dumbass does understand. Unfortunately for him, the business maxim"any publicity is goid publicity" doesn’t apply to criminal actions.