Showing me their vaginas?
Anyone want cookies? I’ve got some left. Also a big bottle of wine. Or if anyone wants, I could bake shortbread or something.
DNFTT
hmmmmmmm Lis. We could sure use your shortbread and big 'ol bottle of wine at our party.
TGF, can I use that as a sig line?
d_redguy, the birthrate is so incredibly low in the West we could easily breed more children with less women. The birthrate isn’t even high enough to maintaim the population as it is. Putting women into the workforce has impacted reproduction far more than putting women on the frontlines as our fighting force would.
Whenever women are “liberated” this happens. There are frequently articles in the papers about the plight of career women who leave it too late to have children, this is a common thing.
Feminism is an evolutionary dead end.
It would be more reasonable to confine women to two roles, both for the perpetuation of society. Reproduction and warfare.
Welcome to the real world, where a phenomenally low birthrate points toward impending extinction.
You’re “thinking” like women, all of you. No reason, just reaction. Try using your head for a change.
Fox in the Snow, the matriarchy doesn’t have a woman at its head, it isn’t an organisation. It is more like a meme or dominant paradigm, the way society is run for the benefit, or perceived benefit at least, of women instead of for the benefit of all.
It is the beliefs and attitudes of the people.
It is also a tool used by the CIA to keep the common man down.
While the matriarchy is in the minds of its slaves, it is also used by the Illuminati to keep other men down.
Nothing like this, no purposeful conspiracy, no plotting, no planning, by women.
Guinastasia, Angry Harry is a right-winger, that’s his main fault. He’s more unbiassed than most, which isn’t saying much. That article quotes directly from a Home Office website, there’s no way to warp it no matter how biassed he may be. He links to the site so it can be easily checked.
bodypoet, you’re just bitter because your dildo keeps falling out of your loose, baggy cunt.
Various others, I don’t support Marc LePine’s actions but he was already mentally unstable and seeing Afirmative Action programmes install rich white women ahead of him would have been more than enough to push him over the edge.
I never support murder, but I understand why he did it.
I support all of my opinions from the OP here, I don’t even see how any of those can be seen as extreme. How long has been sceptical of politically motivated and disproven claims been a bad thing?
Women are ‘“hysterical” over rape’. Otto Weininger was only violent to himself.
d_redguy, the birthrate is so incredibly low in the West we could easily breed more children with less women. The birthrate isn’t even high enough to maintaim the population as it is. Putting women into the workforce has impacted reproduction far more than putting women on the frontlines as our fighting force would.
Whenever women are “liberated” this happens. There are frequently articles in the papers about the plight of career women who leave it too late to have children, this is a common thing.
Feminism is an evolutionary dead end.
It would be more reasonable to confine women to two roles, both for the perpetuation of society. Reproduction and warfare.
Welcome to the real world, where a phenomenally low birthrate points toward impending extinction.
You’re “thinking” like women, all of you. No reason, just reaction. Try using your head for a change.
Fox in the Snow, the matriarchy doesn’t have a woman at its head, it isn’t an organisation. It is more like a meme or dominant paradigm, the way society is run for the benefit, or perceived benefit at least, of women instead of for the benefit of all.
It is the beliefs and attitudes of the people.
It is also a tool used by the CIA to keep the common man down.
While the matriarchy is in the minds of its slaves, it is also used by the Illuminati to keep other men down.
Nothing like this, no purposeful conspiracy, no plotting, no planning, by women.
Guinastasia, Angry Harry is a right-winger, that’s his main fault. He’s more unbiassed than most, which isn’t saying much. That article quotes directly from a Home Office website, there’s no way to warp it no matter how biassed he may be. He links to the site so it can be easily checked.
bodypoet, you’re just bitter because your dildo keeps falling out of your loose, baggy cunt.
Various others, I don’t support Marc LePine’s actions but he was already mentally unstable and seeing
I just thought this bore repeating.
Are you using a speculum, or do you mean the external bits? 
John, look, I realize you haven’t been able to get laid. For what it’s worth, me neither.
But stop being such a cold sack of camel semen.
Blue John - womankind was in fact stupid enough to make a huge, huge, mistake. One of its members bore you.
Thanks, Guin! I ain’t too good at the pitting thing myself.
I do think it’s clear that bluejohn has got some real troubles, and reading his responses here, I’m more inclined to pity him than anything else. He sounds schizophrenic to me, the way he posts hallucinatory garbage about women and claims that it’s factual; it’s as if someone tells me that the trees are walking around in broad daylight, and that that’s just the facts of the matter. How do you argue with someone whose perception of reality is so false?
Someone asked who heads the matriarchy that controls our society. My guess is Georgia Bush, Tanya Blair, Jacqui Chirac, and maybe Sadie Hussein are behind a lot of it, but of course they have their minions as well.
Such insane conspiracy-mongering! The CIA!
bluejohn, please seek counseling. Even if you don’t think you need it, please give it a try. Reality is not what you think it is.
Daniel
I’m going to use my psychic powers to make a prediction.
It’s kinda blurry, getting clearer now.
He won’t last long here. 
I mean, come on, if this isn’t being a jerk, I don’t know what is.
he’s doing it again in the rape thread, by the way.
and now he’s using RELIGION to back him up.
the Bob Jones interpretation that suggests we all stay home and bake.
which reminds me, can i have some shortbread and cookies please?
and a glass of that wine?
cheers.
Dammit, Biggirl, I wanted to make the Justhink comment. Could be a sock.
I should add that I agree with bluejohn in one respect: ain’t no woman alive can make hummus as good as this bad boy can.
'Course, when it comes time to take a schizoid misogynist out behind the toolshed, I know better than to try it myself; Guinastasia’s the woman for the job :D.
Daniel
Thanks. WHICH rape thread is he disrupting-we have about fifty going on right now.
If you ask me, the OP is probably an 85 year old virgin with non-existant hygiene. No wonder he hates women.
sorry.
the original and best trainwreck that is the “1/4 of all women…yadda yadda” in GD.
had a thought, do you think he can join the OTP club?
Hey, that’s unfair. I bet he’s a real hit with the ladies. Once they get a load of his sauve line in chat, what right-thinking lady could resist his charms? Come on Guin, I know Blue John makes you weak at the knees, really! 
Homebrew: Sorry but I can’t see any resemlance to Justhink. For a start, Blue John’s sentences are are actually understandable, just. And he uses paragraph breaks, sometimes. He is a complete loon, but he ain’t no Justhink.
Well, Justhink’s nonsense was created by a program. BJ seems to be creating this nonsense from his own brain.
Makes me sorta pity Mr. Blue. Sorta.
Talking of retarded, from a purely biological standpoint: Ever been on a farm yourself? The point is to keep as many cows lactating at once as possible (for a dairy farm) or breed as much beef as possible. Hence, you need an artificially high birthrate per head of population. With me so far?
Human society is sliiiiightly different. At least in the pampered West, we now expect nearly all mothers to survive childbirth and nearly all babies to survive to maturity and hence to breeding age. Hence, per two head of population, we need a birth rate of not much more than two, in order to maintain the population at its present level.
Now, let war be declared, and figure that we lose maybe ten percent of the population, taken entirely from that part of it in its most fertile years - since it’s a sad fact that these are also the physically most combat-capable years. Say that those years (from twenty to forty) represents one-quarter of modern human lifespan, assuming the population to be evenly distributed for age. (We could get down to more exact math if you really wanted.) We have lost forty percent of our breeders. Assuming that the losses had come equally from male and female, the remaining 60% of fertile women would need only to up their contribution from just over two births apiece to just under four, to make up the shortfall in a single generation.
If you’d taken those losses entirely from the male half of the population, it’s hardly likely to be the case that your remaining male breeders get children on all of the remaining females. I suspect, in societies where monogamy (serial or otherwise) is the norm, what you get is a smaller number of mothers and a large number of unmated females.
Hence and QED, from a biological standpoint, women ceased to be a precious resource round about the time we crack puerperal fever and the infant mortality rate: We no longer need every available woman married and breeding like crazy in order to keep the birth rate up.
Before you bandy about words like retarded*, set your own house in order, and before you reason by analogy, check the analogy for validity. In short, detest BlueJohn all you like, his argument that women are just as dispensible as men holds water… or at any rate, a sight more than yours about cattle-farming.