I’m getting very irritated by people suggesting that I’m a troll, especially since I’ve been trying to modify my behaviour as suggested, subscribing to threads, starting and participating in plenty of things I’m not interested in that much, toning down my language, etc. I even made the effort to post here with a damaged keyboard (after being away for a couple of days and told off for that!) and some people disbelieve me for reasons only known to themselves.
You are the trolls, not me.
[/QUOTE]
Why would you start threads or participate in threads that don’t interest you? And who cares if you “made the effort” to post with a broken keyboard? Why would that prove or disprove trollishness?
[QUOTE=Nikki Tikki Tavi]
Why would you start threads or participate in threads that don’t interest you? And who cares if you “made the effort” to post with a broken keyboard? Why would that prove or disprove trollishness?
[/QUOTE]
Because in an earlier thread someone said that I was sounding trollish through only starting controversial threads. So I’ve tried to diversify.
[QUOTE=NAF1138]
Word of advice. Don’t be a smartass to the few people who are making an attempt to actually talk to you.
[/QUOTE]
I’m not being a smartass, I’m being completely honest - the only one of those threads I read at all was the vagina one, and that’s because I saw it in an earlier thread.
[QUOTE=NAF1138]
Certainly. Your clue is, pop culture.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Small British Shop Owner]
This isn’t a pitting, it’s just an observation put in the pit, because I think it is the correct place to put it according to the categories.
[/QUOTE]
No, I’m pretty sure this should go in MPSIMS, with the rest of the dipshit threads.
Is this right? I don’t know anything about it.
[/QUOTE]
I was looking for, both were considered to be very lowbrow in their day. But I like that answer almost as much as Frank’s, so I will give you second place. My own answer will sadly take third.
[QUOTE=NAF1138]
(Points if you know why I picked Shakepeare and Tchaikovsky)
[/QUOTE]
Because Tchaikovsky used folk melodies in his work and Shakespeare has enough vagina jokes to satisfy a dirty old man?
ETA: Well, apparently I overthought it, and had to look up Tchaikovsky to be sure he used folksongs. I maintain that my answer isn’t all that different from NAF1138’s, though.
[QUOTE=Miss Purl McKnittington]
Because Tchaikovsky used folk melodies in his work and Shakespeare has enough vagina jokes to satisfy a dirty old man?
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Small British Shop Owner]
You are no different to the Victorians who thought all the evidence for evolution was a test from God.
[/QUOTE]
In an attempt to communicate, I ran this through Babelfist, English to Troll and then Troll to English and got “You any by others to Victorians thought entire proof for the development was testing from the god.” So you’ll have to be a little less, ah, dense, in your metaphors.
[QUOTE=Jodi]
In an attempt to communicate, I ran this through Babelfist, English to Troll and then Troll to English and got “You any by others to Victorians thought entire proof for the development was testing from the god.” So you’ll have to be a little less, ah, dense, in your metaphors.
[/QUOTE]
It should be fairly obvious. You have decided on your position, and whatever evidence you get will support it your position once you have interpreted it.
Trolling is against the rules here AFAIK. Pretending to be British would surely be being a jerk. Submit your evidence to the powers that be. Or put it in this thread. Otherwise why should anyone believe you?
