Rove’s Next Trick – If Obama Must Answer For His Minister Now, Just Wait to See What the Republicans Will Do To Clinton Inc. in October
. . .
The Republican insiders aren’t just rooting for Hillary they’re salivating at the chance to run against “THE CLINTONS.” Republicans know that in spite of the Wright “issue,” the absent flag pin “issue,” the who Obama’s acquaintances are “issue,” the if Michelle loves our country enough “issue,” etc., etc., that none of this amounts to anything compared to the HUGE target Bill and Hillary would present in the fall.
. . .
Here’s Karl Rove’s wet dream/Republican strategy. When the Weekly Standard et al. have done their work and, through a series of backhanded compliments, fooled the Democrats into thinking Hillary would be harder to beat than Obama then phase two – the easy destruction of Hillary – will begin.
It’s October 1, 2008, deep in the batcave Rove is talking to his pals…
. . .
"A far bigger issue than Obama’s minister is Hillary’s association with her husband! Anything Rev. Wright said vis-a-vis damage to Obama’s chances against our boy was pale by comparison with what Bill did, said, was and is and Hillary’s political association with him. Even if this isn’t “fair” on so-called moral grounds–as in the privacy of the Clinton’s bedroom, bla, bla, bla,–it’s certainly fair game now because Hillary’s connection to Bill is not just personal-- it’s also a political marriage, especially since he’s out campaigning as much as she is…
. . .
"If who baptized Obama’s children was Hillary’s business (‘I wouldn’t have stayed in that church!’) then who she conceived her child with is all our business too! Even if it isn’t ‘our business’ her candidacy is our business and that’s entirely based on the legitimacy – and damage control – she conferred on Bill by staying with him even after he:
"# Committed adultery in the Oval Office with a young woman about the age of Hillary’s daughter,
"# Pardoned criminals in a manner that – at best – seemed to bolster credible charges of corruption,
. . .
"# Entered into a corrupt relationship with donors to his presidential library,
"# Amassed a fortune in a ‘charitable’ family foundation and only began to disperse some of the money in the context of launching Hillary Clinton’s campaign,
"# Has a continuing reputation (well established by friends, associates and personal connections, check out the new FOX NEWS footage about to be released!) for gross philandering that he will bring back into the White House and keep shaming America,
"# Left the Democratic Party with a discredited legacy, an impeachment and the loss of both houses of congress,
. . .
"So here’s the deal boys. I Karl Rove, tell you this: Since it was legitimate for Hillary to ask why Obama stayed in his church for so long, it’s much more to the point to ask why she stayed with a corrupted, money-grubbing serial sexual predator and what he’ll be doing for the next eight years back in the White House!
. . .