Following on from this thread about Monty Python.
The Goons. The general opinion is that they were the forerunner to Python and revolutionised humour as we know it.
Why are they funny? Why were they ever funny?
I know these things date and the radio shows are over forty years old now, but I really can’t see the humour in them. There seems to be a lot of reliance on silly voices and rotten puns, the kind of thing a five year old loves. Occasionally they manage to be amusing, I’m not arguing they were totally without talent. But were they such giants of comedy that they merit the devotion they still get?
I have never found Spike Milligan amusing. I positively cringed when they wheeled him out on TV programmes through-out the 90s and fell about with obsequious laughter at his every utterance. The man wasn’t funny! It was embarrassing!
Peter Sellers was over-rated. His Pink Panther films were ok, but again he is refered to as a god of comedy.
Harry Secombe? He had one comic character; shouting, pompus bloke who had a habit of bursting into over-inflated song. Not very funny. For a Welshman he also irritatingly kept referring to himself as English.
Michael Bentine I liked in his TV show, with his invisible little people. But then I was a child at the time and he had the sense to get out of the Goons at the first opportunity.
So. Can anyone come up with a convincing defence for this sacred cow of British humour? Or is it about time they got the panning they deserve?