Can someone recommend a good exercise for me?

I have said / implied no such thing.
I actually run, outdoors, approximately 35km a week, in addition to various sports and hiking. You don’t need to tell me the benefits of other forms of exercise than weightlifting.

However, the OP specifically asked about toning up, and mentioned that he’s very skinny. So that presumably means he wants more muscle, since there’s little scope for losing fat.

Now he did also mention not having much cash for weights / the gym. But I’ve been there; I have a couple of books on just working out at home using your own bodyweight. IME someone is wasting their time trying to avoid paying the $30 or whatever to go to the gym each month to faff around trying to get all these exercises to work and increase the difficulty in a linear way.

Trying to offer my experience in this way is in no means me being jerkish; quite the opposite in fact, as I obviously benefit in no way from giving this advice. And I also resent any implication of bamboozling the OP with options. I didn’t even begin to talk about a fitness programme.

So you really believe that is very complicated and time consuming to get push ups, pull ups, Turkish get ups , body weight squats, and burpees (or similar sorts of all over resistance exercises, such as the beginner kettlebell work outs mentioned) “to work”? A previously sedentary novice to fitness with little base strength and muscle, you believe, will not make progress to “some noticeable muscles, nothing too much” and be well prepared to progress farther once there if they so desire, doing those sorts of things?

You needed a book to tell you how to do push ups, pull ups, burpees, and body weight squats? Really? (Okay I can see getting on line to see how to do a Turkish get-up, takes 1 minute tops.) Or did you just make your own basic beginner body weight program needlessly complicated? You don’t need to start with the planche progression you know.

Correct. I know plenty of people that regularly do exercises like that and their physique never changes appreciably. Natch, YMMV and I’m sure you’re about to say you know otherwise. But you can talk about your experience, I can talk about mine.

Plus of course it’s easy to just throw out things like pull ups or kettleballs. But these aren’t free either.
Most homes do not have a horizontal bar for adults to hang off with no danger of breaking anything. So you buy one of those bars to install…you’re already at the point you could have paid to go to the gym for a couple weeks.

Kettleballs, again not free. You can try to find substitutes at home, but few people’s time is so cheap for this to be worth it.

Yes. Because actually to design a range of exercises that cover most of the major muscle groups is not so easy, plus designing them so you get the right amount of difficulty for your strength level.
Granted however, I did buy these books many years ago before all this info was web-searchable. Still, designing such a programme yourself is another investment in time.

Yup, both of us know people who exercise … body weight, classes, weights … who have little that we notice in physique changes for the effort. And some who do. Which means?

Yup, a pull up bar costs maybe $30 tops and will last you, well, your lifetime. A one month gym membership lasts you, well, one month. Does not include the class fee.

Again, not dissing gyms and classes. For some the money is worth it for the socialization if nothing else. Just mocking the idea that exercise is too hard and complicated for the average Joe to pull off effectively at home without a gym and classes and equipment.

A range of exercises to include all the major muscle groups with body weight is hard to design? That is simply goofy talk. Tell me what major muscle groups the simple example program I came up does not hit that say Starting Strength does. Thing about body weight exercises is that it is almost harder to not hit most of the major muscle groups than to miss them. A compound upper body pull and one push; squats; and two that hit pretty much all in concert in different ways, one emphasizing the core stabilizer muscles (the Turkish get up) and one hitting more the explosive plyometric muscles and increasing overall work capacity (burpees). Cycle through two or three sets or as many sets as you can in the time you allocate. Ten minutes is fine if you keep intensity high while maintaining form.

Designing them for your strength level? What’s so hard? Progress will be made so long as you go until the last rep is not so easy to do and doing more with good form would be questionable. Debate if you must over the extra value of 5x5 or whatever you like as most efficient (So and so has been training people for years! You don’t care what the studies say. Scientists don’t train people!) but even if so it does not mean others don’t also work well. Increase difficulty at 5 reps or 15, just increase the difficulty as you advance. Again it is very very easy: you can’t do a pull up then you jump up and let yourself down slowly until you can do a real pull up; you can do five easily, then do seven, then ten, then fifteen, then either wear a weighted backpack (books work) or start a one armed progression (you have plenty of time to look up what those are). Same exact sort of muscle response as deadlifts/squats/bench? Of course not … a different sort but same major muscle groups and more of a different sort of muscle response.

Will progression be exactly linear? No. But why do you believe that linear progression is required? Some data out there that suggests “undulating” (more random) progression works even better.

This is not precision chemistry in which exact right amounts of each exercise reagent must be added at exactly the right time at exactly the right temperatures. It is basic exercise. Use you body as a heavy thing then lift it up and put it down, repeat. Simple as that. Yes you can make it fancier and add more varieties of body weight exercises for the fun and for the challenge as you go. If you want. T-push ups, dive bombers, clapping push-ups, handstand push-ups … but the plain ole basics are a great place to start.

Sorry I’ve been away a few days.

Right so that’s $30 just for that one range of exercises. Then we’ll have to add the cost of the various kettle balls.

Meanwhile, at the gym, $30 is arguably enough money for the OP to achieve his (rather modest) goal.

Now, if you’re asking the question: What’s the most cost-effective way of maintaining a particular physique? Then of course I would agree that buying weights and equipment for the home is cheaper than paying indefinitely at the gym.
But no-one was talking about maintenance. And furthermore, I was saying that trying to find free alternatives just using bodyweight or whatever is a waste of time for the vast majority of people whose time is not so cheap.

Note that in the OP there is mention of trying to put together a program based on videos on the web and finding it difficult. Yes, it is not so straightforward to do this.

If you think you know of effective programs, go ahead and share them, I’m not stopping you. All I was doing was sharing my experience both personally and from observing others. People who thumb their nose at the gym and decide to do everything low-cost at home might lose some weight (e.g. I know some guys doing Insanity that have lost weight) but generally don’t gain muscle IME

Not only did my suggested simple plan not include a range of kettlebells, the poster who suggested a kettlebell approach only suggest one and did not suggest a chin-up bar. I suggested a couple of used milk jugs filled to various levels with water or sand, just for the Turkish get up.

You think one month of a gym membership (remembering that this is a person who is looking for a minimal time investment) is enough to accomplish what the op hopes for? Ooookay.

You have made it clear that your humble opinion is “that trying to find free alternatives just using bodyweight or whatever is a waste of time” - I will state as a fact that you are wrong.

Plyometrics are just one variation of body weight training: 6 weeks of plyometrics did as well as did either traditional weight training or an protocol called “complex training” alternating heavy with lighter sets. All three led to similar significant improvements in strength on the back squat, the Romanian dead lift and the standing calf raise, and in muscle mass.

More comparison between that one sort of body weight training (plyometic training - PT) and conventional resistance training (CRT) shows that “gross muscle size increased both by PT and CRT, whereas only CRT seemed to increase muscle fiber CSA. Gains in maximal muscle strength were essentially similar between groups, whereas muscle power increased almost exclusively with PT training.”

You still say it is not straightforward yet you still can’t tell me what major muscle groups the simple and very straightforward example program of just 5 exercises I came up does not hit.

I have not joined this discussion to try to shout down another side. I’m as interested as anyone in hearing about bodyweight-only programs.

All I’ve tried to do is share my experience with the OP with the aim of helping him. I’ve been in exactly his situation.
So can we dial it back now?

Yes, and what I said was $30 of gym membership is potentially enough time to fulfill his goal.

Note that the claim was made upthread that 4-6 weeks would be enough time using kettleballs to have a noticeable increase in muscle, and your cite is a 6-week study. So the claim is only reasonable to you when it’s not at the gym?

Plyometrics doesn’t necessarily mean using no equipment, and given that we only have this short abstract to go on (the actual paper is behind a pay wall), that doesn’t mention what the improvements were and methods used, it’s not very convincing.
Also of course, it’s trivial to find papers where resistance training is found to be superior to other methods, or mixtures of methods.


And it seems now you are characterizing my position as saying no bodyweight exercise will ever be effective for building muscles for anyone.

Not only have I not said that, but the fact I keep saying I think the cost-benefit works out better for resistance training implies I’m aware someone could get results using bodyweight only.

The problem with bodyweight only exercises is that the OP has to separate the wheat from the chaff. There are proponents of every faddish thing, and there are plenty of programs that I expect will lead the OP nowhere. Based on my experience and seeing others.
Free weights seem less risky to me. Since he’s skinny, as long as he’s using correct form and heavy weights, he should get results no matter which fad of sets, reps, eccentrics and rest durations he’s using.
To get impressive muscles, the methodology will matter, but that’s not what the OP’s asking.

Okay. The op specified that he cannot afford to go to a local gym or buy more than minimal weights. Your help is tell him to join a gym. Fine.

  1. I did not claim that kettlebells would have a noticeable impact in 4 to six weeks and measurable in a study to be as much as with weight training does not significantly grossly visible.

True I cannot find that exact paper full on line … but the same group explain describe their plyometric protocol in this paper (pdf), which measured more sports relevant strength measures (and also found no difference between weight training, plyometrics, and “complex” training): they were body weight lateral jumps, depth jumps, and box jumps for the plyometrics compared to high bar back squat, dead lift, and standing calf raises for the weights arm.

If it is “trivial” to find papers where weight training provided dramatically superior results to a comparable body weight protocol (such that in comparison a body weight protocol is just wasting time) then you will not mind finding some and linking to them. Yeah, that gets a “cite please.”

Actually there are very few faddish body weight (and minimal/improvised weight, like milk jugs and wearing a backpack full of books) programs out there. And lots of ways to for newbie to not learn good form before they try to lift heavy. Oh lots of marketing hype and hoopla for some body weight sites and some that are more aimed at aerobic conditioning, but the requirements for a decent program that will increase overall strength, give some increase in muscle mass, and improve overall fitness in the bargain, are very straightforward:

  1. Compound upper body matching a push with a pull. (For example push-ups and pull-ups, but others can be either substituted or rotated in, such as inverted rows for the upper body pull, which could be done on a table edge if a pull-up bar is too much to spend on.)
  2. A compound lower body exercise. (For example body weight squats progressing to single legged but chair step ups, or plyometric box and lateral jumps could work too, again as either/ors or in a mix.)
  3. At least one all over exercise. (Such as burpees and/or Turkish get-ups.)
  4. Follow progressive principles. Dialing down to a very beginner level is easy but admittedly at higher strength levels pure body weight requires some skills building too.

Of course there is lots of variety to mess with if/when someone wants to: from various static holds, to wall walk ups, to using the milk jugs for goblet squats and lateral raises and flies, to unstable surfaces. But keep it simple to start.

The op states clearly: gyms local to him are outside his current budget.

He does not need to join a gym to get fit and to hit his goal. Most who join gyms rarely go, on average just roughly once a week (the gyms rely on that fact, talk about a waste). And odds are he wants to do more than get to whatever he can in month of exercise and then stop forever.