[sub]Sorry if this isn’t a Great Debate, but I had the feeling it could become one…[/sub]
Can we relax from terrorist activity during the month of Ramadan? Or will the Taliban probably continue their assault while at the same time abstaining from food, liquid and sex from dawn to sunset? Do the Taliban even honor Ramadan?
(I’m not being a smart ass - I’m travelling abroad after Nov 17th and am wondering if I can relax a little)
Just as Christians often wage war on Christmas (e.g. George Washington), Muslims often fight during Ramadan. One of the talking heads on CNN last night offered three examples: the Yom Kippur war in '73 (it was also Ramadan), the Iran-Iraq war during the '80s, and the war against the Russians in Afghanistan.
IANAMoslem, but I have several friends who are. Just off the top of my head, you are allowed to break fast during Ramadan if you are traveling or pregnant. You are not allowed to initiate conflict, but are allowed to defend yourself and not required to fast during Ramadan if you are defending yourself and fellow Moslems from attack.
I don’t know how that squares with the Taliban/Al Qaida’s take on the Qu’ran. I don’t expect them to relent during the Holy month.
The Taliban is busy relocating weapons, ammunition, missiles, etc., in schools, mosques, and hospitals in the hope of blaming U.S. forces of deliberately targeting civilians when the bombs intended for the Taliban go astray. I don’t think they’re too worried about fighting during Ramadan. They’ve got too many other things to worry about, such as, chopping off women’s fingertips if they are polished, forcibly conscripting young men to fight on the front lines, and treating their women as less than animals.
I’ve posted this link regarding Ramadan before (it’s an awful lot of information), but the bottom line is that there are so many exclusions to the requirement to observe Ramadan that the Taliban could continue to fight for the month of Ramadan without in any way violating the laws of Islam.
A couple of media people have put forth the defense that, in past conflicts, Iraqis and other Muslim groups fighting each other did not cease fire during Ramadan; so, if they didn’t do it themselves, why the heck should we? I don’t find that a convincing arguement though; it seems to me that those Muslims in power making such decisions could arguably be classified as extremists (eg, Iraq). That doesn’t mean that a salt-of-the-earth practicing Muslim wouldn’t stop fighting during his holy days. To take the moral high ground, I think it’s important to at least consider the idea, somehow, of respecting Muslim holy days during the conflict we have going there, if nothing else to emphasize that this war is not against the Muslim people.
In other words, let’s say someone was over here fighting Fred Phelps who was launching his own personal holy war against, oh, say, gays. Our old friend Fred decides to keep up his offensive (heh) during the Christmas or Easter holidays. Is it fair for the other side to conclude “Yeah, well, clearly Christians don’t find these days so sacred that they stop fighting… why should we?” ? This is an erroneous conclusion… Fred’s actions don’t necessarily reflect the level of thinking of other Christians.
On the other hand, I also think the Taliban are crazy fuckers who piss on the Koran and therefore we have no obligation to honor their conception of what’s holy (whatever that stance happens to be regarding their holidays). I know enough about them that the whole cultural relativism business is now out the window. Bombs away.
Iraq’s governing party is the Baath. The Baath are Socialists and are anti-religion. Any pretensions to religious provenance for their government’s (Saddam Hussein’s) positions is merely pablum for the ignorant masses.
The point of honouring the Koranic edict against fighting during Ramadan IS NOT to make a point with the Taliban, but rather to show OUR ALLIES that we actually respect their religion enough to not ignore it for our own ends.