But he might change his appearance and come back as Boyo SlimJim.
What if one is neither a conservative or a liberal?
Then you’re only allowed to vote to ban people who are both…
You HAVE to choose one or the other…
Though given that the BBQ pit thread where I am the only one who actually put a candidate forward and have gotten a shit ton of shit for doing so…well, let’s just say this concept needs a bit of tweeking 
Sorry, there is no way that I could completely support everything either side has to say. Especially now … 
First we shoot all the lawyers…
[QUOTE=billfish678]
One caveat.
You have to either take the label of liberal or conservative. And a liberal can only vote to ban a conservative. Or visa versa. And a ban only results when a certain percentage of either population reaches a consensus.
[/QUOTE]
I suppose this makes some sense, as the 5 board conservatives would be able to come to a consensus and start voting folks off the island, while the 10k board liberals wouldn’t be able to focus their wrath enough to get rid of any one particular conservative without all sorts of in fighting. Personally, I think what we really need is to allow the moderates to take control of this process and ban from the middle…
I propose that we ban the committee on banning.
You missed the meeting. The old committee banned the new committee.
As a bonafide internet doctor, I would be honored to serve on the death committee. I meet all the requisite requirements, including absolutely no formal medical schooling. We wouldn’t want to cloud our life or death decisions with all that sciency stuff.
I apologize for adding to this thread. Those responsible for banning the old committee who had been banning posters have just themselves been banned.
But we still get to keep the mani interesting furry animals.
As I said in the other thread we should have called the panel “Committee of Public Safety”, and there you have it, Robespierre banned Danton and then…