You don’t understand. Sure we’ve got the COC going on about “Own the Podium” and so on but this is hockey. Every and any lose is teased apart and reviewed. Goals against are dissected and blame is assigned. Lack of gold is criminal and no podium presence is enough to plunge the national psyche into despondent self recrimination until the next world tournament. At which point we crank the self flagellation back up.
russia was smothered by the Canadian checking. It seemed as if the Getzlaf line was on the ice just to scare the russians with bad giveaways. Ovechkin did nothing, Malkin was invisible, Semin too. Surprising how that game turned out, I bet most of us would’ve laughed if someone said Canada would win with a 7-3 score. I woulda thought more shootout drama and one team being very disappointed with the shootout loss.
You fucking kidding me? Only once every 20 years? There’s plenty of countries around with more than 33 million people who’ve never had the Olympic games, let alone three times in 34 years. In terms of getting the Olympics, the Canadians are the among the most overrepresented people in the world. Not that I blame them, but to say that ‘they only get it every 20 year or so’ doesn’t make too much sense when no country in Africa has ever had the Olympics.
If you won bronze you lost your game against number one or two, then won against number four. How’s that better than winning against three or four, losing against number one?
I guess I see the logic, but it seems odd to me. I’d much rather lose to the number one and be the second best team than beat the number four and be the third best.
It’s not a matter of logic, but emotion. They hold the medal ceremony right after the gold medal game, when the winners are on a high, the losers are at the depths, and the winners of the bronze get to come on having won a game earlier in the day.
Watching the medal ceremony tonight for the women’s hockey, the Canadian team was ecstatic, the Finns, for bronze, had big smiles on their faces. The Americans - holding back tears, the occasional brave smile. I saw one looking at her silver medal, almost with a grimace.
The colour commentator on CTV had been on the Canadian women’s team in Nagano in 1998. She made some comment about how she had won silver in 1998, and stopped for a minute, and then said, “It took me several years to learn to say that I “won” silver.” That sums it up.
Again, I’ll state that a silver in hockey is the prize for losing. A bronze is the prize for winning. Odd, perhaps, but there you go.
I will say that I was pleased to see Canadian fans in the stands during the medal and flower ceremony, either waving the Stars and Stripes, or at least applauding the American players. We may be rivals in sports, but we are good friends, and friendly rivals. I am glad to see that of all the teams in the tournament, we played the Americans, and both teams played well–a score of 2 - 0 is not a bad loss at all and indicates good play on both sides. Congratulations to the Canadians, the Americans, and the Finns. Well done, folks!
There’s only one medal in Olympic hockey for Canadians.
I sure hope we didn’t trade men’s gold for Rochette’s bronze, but I am pleased as punch she got it.
Northern Piper: Gold is winning. Your team just won a game. Silver is losing. Your team just lost a game. Bronze is happiness about reaching the podium. Your team just won a game.