Care to help a roo in deciding what to do??

Put me down for #1.

I think #2 is really cool looking, makes it a little more personal I think.

#2 has that really attractive eye. I like that one. Like the others say, it looks more personal. I would pick that one if it is to be a personal HP if it is a more work related HP I would pick #1.

I think a combp of #1 and #2 (I feel like I’m ordering combos a t Wendy’s) would be the best, but of the three, I like # 1 the best.

If you made the background of #2 darker, it would look cool, too.

As it is, they all look pretty nice.

Definitely #2, though I would grey out and lighten the background color and punch up the colors of the graphic in the middle. The eye part is way cool.

I like #1, megaroo. It draws you into the page. I like the original backgrond color too.

The eye is neat, but the composition seeems unbalanced to me.

In either case, I love the name!

I like #1, megaroo. It draws you into the page. I like the original backgrond color too.

The eye is neat, but the composition seeems unbalanced to me.

In either case, I love the name!

I’m in the first choice camp myself, though you do have a lovely eye (heres hoping theres a second one).

I’m for #1…those that disagree are heathens. Your false webpage designs will take you to hell!

I like #1 best, then 3 then 2. Good luck. Great name, I can’t wait until you’ve completed it for us to tour.

My vote is for the first one. The darker background makes the figure stand out more than the light background.

I think the eye in number two, although nicely done, looks like it should be followed by ads for cosmetics or health care.

Put me down for #1.

I like #2, it just reminds me of Gap.com spam.

I vote for #2. It’s clean, crisp, and unique. I really like it.

The wavy look in #1 & #3 hurts my eyes.


14 hours, 2 minutes and 41 seconds.
7 cigarettes not smoked, saving $1.09.
Life saved: 35 minutes.

Okay, no. When I came home today there was supposed to be a voting ratio of at least 1:5. I didn’t really care which had the one and which had the five, just that there was a big enough difference for me to make a decision.

Don’t get me wrong, I really appreciate all your input… it’s just that you were all supposed to like the same one.

:slight_smile:

I definitely wote for #01 but I have to ask what a cattywompus is?

After all your helpful posts, opinions and hours of contemplation, a decision has been made.

::: Opening the envelope :::

The new splash page for Megan’s Cattywompus will (although slightly altered) be, The Cloudishnessess

MTR: you are a talented and charming person. Keep it up.

sh

Actually, I liked the idea of using #2’s design but with the clouds from #1 in all that white space. Or is that too busy?
Anyway, I designed a crappy, overdone main page for my new site (since my old host vanished from the net) and have managed to get it down to a little better-organized design–still busy, tho’. Of course, that’s my “main page”; the front page, which I call my “gate page” is pretty subdued right now.
http://www.angelfire.com/journal/foolsguinea
(Boy, that’s a long URL! Maybe I should’ve gone for the “jazz” section instead of “journal.”)

I quite like the one you went with, mega, though I got home too late to vote.

If I may, foolsguinea: That’s a realy cool image for your splash page, but you should probably lose that background on the first page behind it. It’s a real headache-inducer.

Catrandom

Darn, I didn’t like that one, it makes my eyes go all swimmy.

Oh well.

By the way, foolsguinea, I like your splash page… but your inside pages could use a little toning down. Just some minor advice…