I’m currently reading ‘The War of the World’ by Niall Ferguson and this line on page ‘xlv’ of the introduction had me raise my eyebrow.
“…when a Chinese woman marries a European man, the chances are relatively high that their blood groups may be incompatible, so that only the first child they concieve will be viable.”
Now I may be being dense (always a distinct possibility) but I’m having trouble understanding that sentence, if their blood groups are incompatible why would that cause a problem and why would it not affect their first child?
He’s probably talking about hemolytic diseases of the newborn, the most common of which is due to Rh incompatibility. Basically, if the mother is Rh negative and the fetus is Rh positive, the mother can react to the fetus’s Rh positive blood and produce antibodies that can kill the fetus. Since generally this happens at childbirth, the first Rh positive baby is fine (because the baby is born by the time the mother can produce antibodies), but then, if the mother has another RH positive baby, there’s a good chance it won’t come to term unless there’s medical involvement.
If the father is Rh+ and the mother is Rh-, the child can be Rh+ which can cause complications for the mother. I suppose it’s possible that there could be uterine damage that would not prevent birth but might prevent the mother from conceiving again, although I certainly know plenty of half Asian, half Caucasian kids with brothers and sisters, so I guess it’s not impossible.
I think he might have it backwards, though, because almost all East Asians are RH positive. You only really find RH negative in Europeans (and to a much lesser extent in Africans), so you’re more likely to see a problem if a Chinese man marries a European woman.
Rh difficulties are now treatable, I understand. But I’ve never heard of them causing any difficulties in a Caucasian husband/Asian wife combo. I have quite a few friends in white/Asian marriages so I think I would have heard of it. (And now a simul-post confirms, not a problem.)
Anne Boleyn’s problem was quite probably Rh incompatibility, though it’s impossible to say.
That seems to be exactly what’s being referenced- except according to this ,http://www.exacteditions.com/exact/browse/1/1/1696/3/69 , he does have it backwards- the risk for a Chinese woman and a European man is less than 1% and risk for a European woman and a Chinese man is 15 percent which is only slightly higher than the risk for two Europeans at 13%
Huh. Husband’s father is Filipino and his mother is French/Swedish, and the reason he doesn’t have any sibs is due to the Rh factor (when he was born in the mid 60’s it was still an issue).
I did not know that Asian father/Caucasion mother made that more likely. That’s pretty interesting.
Even overlooking the fact that Ferguson was mixed up about the risk for “European/Chinese” pairings, I have to ask: what year did he write that stuff? Nowadays, the risk of hemolytic disease of the newborn should not be an issue in any place where there’s access to modern ‘Western’ medicine - it’s preventable. We did a thread on that a few months ago.
The book was published in 2006, so its pretty recent. The author is an historian so he may be getting into an area beyond his expertise with that quote.
Rh disease is preventable. Other hemolytic diseases are treatable with varying degrees of success, but not necessarily prevantable. E.g. anti-Kell.
One of my colleagues has had this problem with 3 of her 5 pregnancies. The first was uneventful (kell negative mother, kell positive baby). The second pregnancy was lost early on, and this is when they discovered the Kell antigen problem. The third pregnancy was carried longer, with lots of intervention including maternal infusions and fetal transfusions, but was lost in month 5 despite treatment. The fourth pregnancy was brought nearly to term with maternal infusions and fetal transfusions and resulted in a healthy nearly-full-term baby. Her fifth pregnancy was uneventful because it was a Kell negative baby.
This was all at a very reputable Boston hospital.
I am kind of hoping they don’t try for more kids! :eek:
This happened to my maternal grandparents. Mom is Rh+, and her parents had two more children that were also Rh+, and, while they were born, they died soon afterwards. Memaw and Papaw decided not to have any more children, but they accidentally had another son. Luckily, he turned out to be Rh-.
I read his introduction, and he’s talking about absent modern medicine. He’s saying that there are evolutionary biologists who suggest that people have a natural tendency to seek out mates who are neither too genetically close or genetically distinct from them, and part of that could have to do with fetal problems caused by excessive inbreeding or excessive outbreeding.
ON the surface this seems like total bullcrap. I am not a doctor, nor do I play one on TV. My wife is Chinese, we know tons of Amerasians, there were no warnings issued when pregnant. If this was a significant problem, I think I would have heard something by now.