You are sexually attracted to very young children, you want laws changed so that you can rape those very young children with no penalty, you find nothing wrong with that attraction and and those beliefs and have vociferously defended them, and you want to talk about them in public without being called names or looked down upon.
There’s nothing, NOTHING, about your beliefs and actions that is defensible. Your even wanting to talk about it is nothing more than sexual gratification, in that you get to talk about your fantasies and defend them.
I think you misinterpreted my comment there. Misrepresentations and mischaracterizations are what would convince me I need to respond. The general abuse and name-calling I’ve been ignoring.
No. I would like to see laws changed to make the standard of informed consent actually mean something reasonable (like requiring people to be informed) versus the current arbitrary-line-in-the-sand-based-on-nothing system that I see as causing no good and a great deal of harm.
Nope. Nothing wrong with it at all.
Well, those that actually reflect my beliefs. You got one of them wrong, after all.
Well, that’d be nice, but it isn’t a strictly necessary part of my long-term planning.
I disagree.
If anything, it feeds into my desire to confront bullies and make up for having rolled over for them too often in my youth.
I’m not going to sift through your perverted posts, because reading them makes me want to vomit. You’ve stated your opposition to child porn laws, and have stated that kiddy fucking laws are drawn at some arbitrary age that you don’t agree with, because in your sick mind, there’s an 11 year old somewhere who is consenting to being boned by an old man, and it’s unfair that said old man would be imprisoned for boning said 11 year old. You also seem to be under the impression that we all have an inner pedophile, and we watch shows and movies where kids are abused because we’re drawn to the idea of children being violated, but we dress it up as outrage. No. We don’t.
**You **want to fuck children. We don’t. There **is **something wrong with it. Fuck off heartily.
Here’s the thing: I don’t give a flying fuck what you actually meant. You shouldn’t be posting about sex or kids. At all. Not directly, not indirectly, not with a little winking smiley. At all. Those topics are not for you.
As long as you continue to do so, I’ll continue wanting you to shut the fuck up and go away.
Thank you for illustrating my point. You’re a disgusting, perverted, pathetic little piece of filth. I knew right after I originally posted that I would regret responding to you.
People like you create pain, suffering, and chaos, and revel in that. People like you cause permanent physical and psychological damage throughout others’ lives to satisfy your selfish, creepy, unnatural desires, with no remorse.
You are scum, and I hope at some point you receive exactly what’s coming to you.
eta: this post is aimed at the pedophile, not the people who posted intervening responses.
Then please refrain from trying to speak authoritatively about something you know nothing about (specifically, the content of my posts, and the views represented therein).
Yes I have. For various reasons with a number of caveots, but as they stand now, yes, I opose them.
Not at all the reason I disagree with them. It isn’t that I disagree with where the line is placed, but rather I disagree with the method by which it is drawn. Age is not the metric we actually care about (if we’re being honest with ourselves when we talk about why we don’t want kids having sex). What we care about is whether there is meaningful consent. It makes infinitely more sense to discern if someone is capable of meaningful consent than it does to just throw out a random number and say you can give meaningful consent if the number of birthdays you’ve had is greater than that number.
Seems to me profoundly unfair that one party should be imprisoned for fully consensual sex, true, but I’m a bit more concerned about the impact the arrest has on the 11 year old.
That’s really only for those people who engage in recreational outrage on this subject. Those who don’t, obviously don’t apply to such statements, and its obvious that such recreational outrage isn’t universal behavior.
In the same sense that I want to own a functional light saber, yes.
I have acknowledged that being a pedophile puts me in a sexual minority.
No there isn’t.
Please be careful about the language. We’ve already had people moderated for doing that.
As I said, I don’t really care about the frothing and the flaming.
Pain, suffering, permanent physical damage, permanent psychological damage to who? Are my plain text words really causing you long-term physical pain? What mechanism are my words inflicting chronic conditions on you by?
One should always be careful about wishing friends or foes get what they deserve, as you occasionally misestimate what said party deserves.
I didn’t say I haven’t read your posts, I said I’m not going to sift through them. That is, I’m not going to search through your sick shit to point out where you said what you said.
Yes. There is. That is the problem, that you do not recognize this.
I’ll use whatever language I damn well please. Moderate away. When warned, I’ll just be like you, and continue the behavior anyway. So uhh, fuck you, Cesario.
edit: crazyburrito, i will rip no one anything. I’m done with him. Oh, and Lavender, you are correct. There is no such thing as a consenting 11 year old.
They understand that quality oatmeal doesn’t need any fucking sugar!
Call me crazy but I’m going to go out on a limb and state unequivocably, that if you think having sex with children is morally acceptable, you are not civilized.
11-year-olds? Gimme a break…that’s Cesario’s version of a lemon party.
But the issue here isn’t whether or not Cesario should be allowed to fuck babies and toddlers. The issue here is that Cesario is an attention-whoring troll who adores being the center of attention, and knows how to game the system skillfully enough to remain within the rules while pushing people’s buttons and making them lose their shit. Just look how many people have been warned and/or suspended in this thread alone – all because they can’t control themselves when confronted with a person who supposedly likes to fuck babies and toddlers.
Frankly, we only have ourselves to blame for giving this pathetic turd far more attention than he deserves. The mature course of action would be to ignore him completely, and wait for him to go away…but obviously, that ship has sailed. Therefore, I recommend that the moderating staff rescind the rules against calling people certain names or wishing death on someone, for the purposes of this thread only – and then, we’ll see how things shake out.