GO AWAYtext
Sorry, but I have a policy of not giving personal identifying information out on the internet. It’s advice I was taught back in school that I find is still quite valid today.
Was that kiddie fucking school?
I presume you haven’t read my RMSC proposal.
I so wish I hadn’t mentioned it. I’m sorry, Auntbeast.
Shut up, troll.
I love how the SDMB powers that be apparently don’t mind being linked to this guy. The longer they keep him around, the more opportunity he’ll have to post little nuggets like this. Of course the woman who had once been a victim of sexual abuse would write a post with “because they don’t like what I want to do with this adult” as an implicit meaning.
More accurately, in the extremely unlikely situation described (said child was already in the process of raping me) I would not immediately stop them. Seriously, the thread has further discussion you can read directly.
You know what annoys me most about you Cesario? You make really obnoxious statements, then put on a cool face of rationality when people get pissed at you for it. It’s a common conversational tactic in every part of the world in every mode of life.
Look how you try to weasel out of what you said in that thread. Cesario, man up. You said, for no good reason, that if you suddenly found yourself being fellated by a young girl, you would accept the fellatio. Do you think that someone who finds this comment repulsive is a bigot?
I found it an incredibly unlikely scenario. So unlikely that before reading that thread, I had never even considered what my reaction would be. I like to think I’ve put together a rational moral stance, and thought through the consequences to myself and others ahead of time, so I’ll be less likely to do something wrong or hurtful if I find myself in a situation of needing to make a decision.
I honestly spoke about my thought-process as I was considering what I would do in that situation and why I was thinking what I was. No more, no less.
Whether or not the statement was rationally defensible or even true is beside the point. I will admit, right up front, that the thread was already on a shaky topic, but nobody was looking for you to share your take on the hypothetical scenario that a little girl would somehow end up sucking your dick. There is such a thing as an inappropriate comment. There is such a thing as something that almost nobody wants to think about.
You made us think about it. You made me, if only for an instant, imagine a man taking great sexual pleasure as a little girl sucks his dick. I didn’t want this image. I do not ever want to have mental images like this. And the thread never called for you to share this thought.
Imagine if I had burst into that thread and just randomly shared the fact that I would love to wake up with a leopard licking my nuts. Would that have been appropriate? No.
What if I had made a comment like that in a thread for no good reason? What would you assume about me? Might you assume that I was an attention whore? Might you assume that I had some serious emotional issues? Might you assume that I had some sick desire to share my nasty fantasies with other people?
Don’t bullshit me. The answer is yes.
How long is he going to last if he doesn’t end up getting banned ?
How long do you think the …man… will reasonably survive on this board after all this anyway?
Not trying to be inflammatory here. Just an honest question.
(Cesario, Bucko.)
Thank you for correcting me. I stand 100% by the rest of the post however. ::tips hat::
Ed Zotti posted this in the ATMB thread:
If it is no longer allowed for us to provoke Cesario, I think this thread should be closed immediately.
I haven’t read this entire thread, nor have I read more than bits of the few scattered threads in the past where other posters engage Cesario, but I’ve got to agree with Diogenes re his take on the issue. On one hand, in a strictly objective sense, pedophilia is a sexual inclination like being heterosexual or homosexual except the sexual urge is focused on children as objects of attraction. Is that evil in an of itself? Probably not, it’s just the way he’s wired, but the lack of equality of power in most pedophilic encounters means they are, by their nature, inherently manipulative and predatory to some degree, and that is evil, or at the very least socially maladaptive.
Where does the right of person to speak their opinon begin and end? I think for the purposes of this discussion it’s when someone is doing more deliberate “dance puppets dance” shit stirring than encouraging a constructive dialog. The problem is that how are you going to have a constructive dialogue with a person for whom indulging their sexual inclination involves being a de facto predator. All that’s ever going to happen is outrage and a trainwreck.
It’s valid, I suppose, for Cesario to say “Well that’s your problem, not mine.”, but I think there needs to be a real world acknowledgement that even with a group of generally progressive, open minded people pedophiles are not going to tolerated even in passing. It may not be entirely fair, but sometimes board admins need to decide when enough is enough.
Double Dumbass on me. Clicked the wrong thing, didn’t check before posting the link.
Wow…just…wow. Try “incredibly fucked up thought patterns.”
You should not be working with children.
I don’t believe you. I flat out do NOT believe you.
The SDMB where the moderators and administration will come to the defense of a pedophile who would like to fuck five year olds! Even in a forum where you are supposed to be able to vent how disgusting said behavior actually is.