Chen019: A bigger fool that follows other fools

[Chen019]

@GIGObuster

And, Chen should stop showing all who was the coward in the end, he should reply to the rest the post, not just to the “words” comment.

Heh, from your comments I don’t think cowardice is your problem, just confusion and inability to comprehend basic logic.

[GIGObuster]

@Chen019

Heh, from your comments I don’t think cowardice is your problem, just confusion and inability to comprehend basic logic.

As shown, you are pretending that your logic is not excluding the middle and ignoring the evidence, you should read what the environmentalists are actually writing about before stupidly saying that guys like Lester Brown help you.

Anyhow, "It’s a stupid debate, and I think anti-immigration enviros are a tiny, tiny minority whose voice is amplified by media hungry for controversy.

You’d be hard-pressed to find a better example of short-term, misanthropic thinking than trying to cut off immigration to the U.S. for environmental reasons. It’s a political loser, a moral loser, an economic loser … it’s a loser of an argument." - From the site that was recommended by Lester Brown.

[magellan01]

@GIGObuster

As shown, you are pretending that your logic is not excluding the middle and ignoring the evidence, you should read what the environmentalists are actually writing about before stupidly saying that guys like Lester Brown help you.

Anyhow, "It’s a stupid debate, and I think anti-immigration enviros are a tiny, tiny minority whose voice is amplified by media hungry for controversy.

You’d be hard-pressed to find a better example of short-term, misanthropic thinking than trying to cut off immigration to the U.S. for environmental reasons. It’s a political loser, a moral loser, an economic loser … it’s a loser of an argument." - From the site that was recommended by Lester Brown.

I had given up on you. But seeing as you have this new found interest in formal logic, I thought you may enjoy addressing something Chen wrote much earlier. Please keep in mind that all the numbered items refer to what transpires within U.S. borders. In fact, I will slightly alter what he wrote and take his name off (as to not pout words in his mouth). Try being direct and not shooting off on tangents. Here you go:

[QUOTE=Chen019]

1. Population growth is seen as a stressful thing for the U.S. environment (US 400 million+), as it would be for any environment.

2. Immigration is projected to be a major driver of US population growth.

3. Therefore reducing immigration is one effective way to reduce US population growth, and the added stress it would bring.

[/QUOTE]

[DMC]

@Capitaine_Zombie

I thought “focusing on a single issue” was a summary of your posting history, dude. It’s not like it’s leaving you a lot of room to be sarcastic about it.

Indeed.

I grabbed a page of search results of threads he has participated in and in the first thread on that page, he was fighting the “race is a social construct” school of thought, most likely in preparation for his subsequent dissertations on how black people and brown people are stupid.
Second thread, Muslims are extremists.
Third thread, immigrants are destroying the environment.
Fourth, black people are stupid.
Fifth, back to immigrants and their raping of the environment.
Sixth, Cleopatra wasn’t black and afrocentrists are idiots.
Seventh, too many Muslims moving to Europe.
Eighth, too many Muslims moving to Europe again.
Ninth. Finally a thread about something else, Harry Reid specifically. Oh wait, it was about his use of the term “negro”, so never mind.
Tenth, back to “race is more than a social construct.”

In fact, every single one of his “contributions” in the 25 threads listed on that page contain the same racist drivel he’s been dishing out this whole time.

Clearly a poster of varied interests. As long as those interests involve telling us the problems with black people, brown people, and muslims.

[Chen019]

@ magellan01,

GIGObuster can’t answer that, at least not in any sensible or honest manner. Sadly, I think you were right to give up on him/her.

[GIGObuster]

@magellan01

I had given up on you. But seeing as you have this new found interest in formal logic, I thought you may enjoy addressing something Chen wrote much earlier. Please keep in mind that all the numbered items refer to what transpires within U.S. borders. In fact, I will slightly alter what he wrote and take his name off (as to not pout words in his mouth). Try being direct and not shooting off on tangents. Here you go:

It is not effective, for pedantic and practical reasons, the preponderance of the evidence shows that most environmentalists do agree that immigration should not be the focus.

[GIGObuster]

@Chen019

@ magellan01,

GIGObuster can’t answer that, at least not in any sensible or honest manner. Sadly, I think you were right to give up on him/her.

As others like **DMC **show, all are giving up on you guys. You are not fooling anyone.

[Chen019]

@GIGObuster

It is not effective, for pedantic and practical reasons, the preponderance of the evidence shows that most environmentalists do agree that immigration should not be the focus.

1. What are the pedantic and practical reasons you speak of?

2. That loops back to my GD thread on why environmentalists avoided the topic. I suggested political correctness was a major factor. Certainly it makes no sense from an environmental perspective.