This is a training game (I’m a retired professional chess coach) and should interest spectators as well.
Zombywoof can:
take a move back (if he happens to blunder horribly, I’ll point that out!)
ask my advice on his next move
ask questions about strategy + tactics
read my running commentary on the game
I’d prefer he didn’t use a computer (I do practice against them, but this is about Zombywoof learning for himself) and I’d appreciate spectators not making suggestions here (for the same reason.)
So here is a thread for spectator comments:
N.B. If a kind soul would like to link this thread to a board position, that would be much appreciated.
Zombywoof, you have White.
There is no time limit (so don’t worry if real life intervenes…)
We’ll be using the standard algebraic notation (e.g. e4.)
For your interest, the standard opening moves are:
This position is one I happily play from both sides.
The pawns in the centre can stay blocked for ages, which means manoeuvring around the sides and slow build-ups.
My kind of chess!
He certainly would (especially as my other game v Chessic Sense is using the Nimzo-Indian, also inspired by the great man.)
White has set up a pawn chain, which gives him more space. Black needs to undermine it, or else his bishop on c8 will never get into the game.
One of Nimzovich’s many ideas was that attacking a pawn chain at the base (here effectively d4, since Black can play … cxd4 any time) was better than attacking the head of the chain (i.e. e5.)
However this is a valid position for both sides and (although a slow game) it should be interesting to see the build-ups…
Hey, I’m a chess coach!
(Yes, this variation is largely about the d4 pawn. If you can defend it and also use your space advantage to press forward elsewhere, Black is under pressure. However if you get tied down to defence, I’m better.)
Chess (as somebody once said) is difficult.
9. Be3 loses a pawn to Qxb2.
I offer you a takeback!
Ack, right…I know a problem of mine is a tendency to rush moves without carefully looking at all their implications (silly as that sounds when playing correspondence style like this…)
I think now might be the time for b3 with the intention of following up with Bb2…not sure what other options there are for shoring up d4’s defenses (Nc3/a3 then Nb5?)