Riight. Then why did you bring up global warming in a thread that has nothing to do with it? Why did you bring up government imposed speech restrictions in a thread that has nothing to do with it? Why did you mis-characterize the argument made by the racists and the rebuttals to that argument?
It’s very obvious what kind of game you are trying to play. You racists always think you’re being clever, but you aren’t.
Because you are an unpleasant person, and I don’t like you.
A yes, I forgot to note that as a crank magnet Chief Pedant also goes for the denial that humans are changing the climate in harmful ways. FXMastermind also does, and as I noted before supporters of that view are becoming rarer and rarer so he has to defend other cranks.
Even if those cranks are also holocaust deniers or racists.
I would say you were unpleasant, but unpleasant doesn’t begin to cover it. You are a deeply vile person.
Et voila, encore le cirque…
now the extremists can dance in their circle each repeating the other side are just the most terrible ever.
boring.
Spare us the false equivalence.
Ah, I didn’t realize there was a Bigot Brigade in action here. I wonder if they tag-out and in when they come into threads, like professional wrestlers.
Interesting. I just assumed that we weren’t paying him enough attention, so he moved the topic to his favorite. “Look at me, look at me.”
Well, lets be fair, it is hard to be a bigot of mercury fillings… 
I know, I know. How do you get a one-armed bigot out of a tree?
Wave.
Does that help at all? (kill the boredom that is)
That’s a goddamn lie, and you know it. It’s one reason why you are such an unpleasant person.
Meh, whatever Captain Amalgam.
I already called Bingo!, maggie, no need to repeat yourself.
No, that’s a lie. It’s that you tell lies like that, that makes you so unpleasant.
Tsk, tsk, tsk… You’re so unbright. The point of the post you to which this was, evidently, a response to was your eagerness—your need—to conflate racial with racist. The post about your childish need to hurl invective and ad hominems came earlier. Please try to keep your stupidity straight.
That’s your response to being called out for telling lies? That’s all you got?
What the fuck man? What did you expect was going to happen when you lied?
For a guy who complains so much about invective, you sure seem to be spending more time on doing it yourself than on actual engagement with people who try to honestly answer your questions.
I’ll repeat this again: for literally centuries, people have been claiming that black people are inherently inferior in intelligence. And for centuries, these people have been saying that they have good data and good reason to believe this. Also, for centuries, people have been saying that Jews are inherently greedier and less trustworthy. And for centuries, these people have been saying that they have good data and good reason to believe this.
Everyone who made these claims thought they had good data and good reason. Why is it any different now? Why are CP’s claims, which according to him are far more than just a hypothesis, any different? If he was just saying “maybe genes might be part of the answer to this question”, that would be one thing… but he’s not saying that; he’s saying without reservation that black people on average have inherently inferior genes for intelligence.
Aha, so that’s why this thread is full of shit.
You’re attempt to try and claim that racist arguments aren’t racist is the stupidity here. You’re a racist idiot. And your racism makes you impervious to the actual science involved here.
Calling you a racist isn’t ad hominem, because that’s what you are.