A thoughtful, nuanced take by Chimera on the merits of Huffpo spilling out a plethora of personal details on a social media user who may or may not be a “public figure.”
https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=20993734&postcount=37873
If what she’s posted is so odious, why hasn’t twitter banned her for hate speech?
What’s fun is that the article points out that they didn’t really have to do any work because she’d doxed herself several times in the last few years.
She also maintained a Muslim registry, open to the public, inviting more people to put Muslims and “accomplices” in. She had a doxxing factory to facilitate these people’s harassment. She actively harassed people herself, and had followers who were harassing others.
So a woman who had already doxxed herself and ran a doxxing factory on people she hated, and here you are defending her.
And it’s not like this thread went well for you last time…
Just don’t suggest that he might be a broflake. Homie gots him a lo-o-o-o-ong memory.
Or as Popehat (a law blog) said: “Hmm. What are the ethics of doxxing someone who makes and publishes enemies lists like her “Islamic accomplice” site?”
– nm –