So what you’re saying is you’d rather be on another board entirely?
[QUOTE=faithfool]
2) the current trend (or has this always been so and I just missed it?) of purposely going into a thread you hate to only say that you hate and take issues with everyone else posting that wanted to be there.
[/QUOTE]
I don’t know about this one. If there’s a thread titled, “Who else likes to put their cellphone up their butt?” it is perfectly reasonable to post “Not me!” or “Do not put your cellphone up your butt!” Especially if you know the poster IRL and have borrowed his cellphone.
[QUOTE=CynicalGabe]
8. Why do old people have to drive so fucking slow?
[/QUOTE]
Can I file this one in the LAME-O rants file along with “My mother-in-law is crazy”, “Why do people drive slow in the fast lane?”, and “My neighbor is loud.”
It’s like listening to some stand-up comedian’s material from 1972 on amateur night.
I’m not sure I can take this thread seriously. You forgot to make #3 Hi Opal!.
I hate it when people nitpick the smallest mistakes.
[QUOTE=CynicalGabe]
Oh noes! Someone killed a pet mongoose and then sodomized it in front of kindergarten students while singing “It’s A Small World After All”.
[/QUOTE]
BTW, it’s “it’s a small world”.
You bastard.
–FCOD
I couldn’t sleep last night, so I went on a rant-page. The thread title stopped matching the content after the first couple of sub-rants.
[QUOTE=Hampshire]
It’s like listening to some stand-up comedian’s material from 1972 on amateur night.
[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I wouldn’t know anything about amateur night in 1972. I’m not old. 
The GEICO cavemen.
That’s normally what I do, rather than read the thread anyway and post some turd of discontent like some poster whose name starts with “l” and ends with “issener”
You eat stupid food for breakfast.
Because obviously my opinions should dictate reality.
Instead, why don’t you try to organize a reunion of all the banned Dopers. Then you could say “We’re getting the banned back together.”
[QUOTE=CynicalGabe]
You eat stupid food for breakfast.
[/QUOTE]
Some memes never lose their zing.
[QUOTE=CynicalGabe]
Instead, why don’t you try to organize a reunion of all the banned Dopers. Then you could say “We’re getting the banned back together.”
[/QUOTE]
Maybe you could hold a concert to raise money for this noble purpose. What do we call it, though?
I lurked for no more than two weeks. I win Ed Zotti’s voice on my answering machine, right?
[QUOTE=silenus]
Maybe you could hold a concert to raise money for this noble purpose. What do we call it, though?
[/QUOTE]
Obviously the “Battle of the Banned”. But that might infringe on the copyright of a certain DeadJournal…
Ed Zotti is really Carl Kassel! I should have known…
[QUOTE=Cisco]
I hate how every single new member has to make it clear, in each of their first thousand posts, exactly how many years and how often they lurked.
[/QUOTE]
This is less irritating than the people who call radio talk shows and say “I’m a first-time caller”. I realize they’re mostly trying to indicate that they are clueless mumbling ninnies and hoping that the host won’t be too tough on them. But sometimes you get the feeling they are trolling for an award. “O.K.! A new caller! Leave your name with the operator and get a coupon for 50% off a Dick Cheney bobblehead doll from our promotional department!”
Is this video on YouTube? I can’t find the link. 
[QUOTE=CynicalGabe]
Obviously the “Battle of the Banned”.
[/QUOTE]
Talking about obvious, how in the world did you miss the clear reference to “Banned Aid”?
[QUOTE=tomndebb]
Talking about obvious, how in the world did you miss the clear reference to “Banned Aid”?
[/QUOTE]
A shameful oversight.
I think someone who has “Cynical” right in his username should be given free reign to frown on things as he sees fit. It’s not like we weren’t warned.
[QUOTE=featherlou]
I think someone who has “Cynical” right in his username should be given free reign to frown on things as he sees fit. It’s not like we weren’t warned.
[/QUOTE]
Free rein, too.
No, no…featherlou is right.
[QUOTE=CyniclaGabe]
Because obviously my opinions should dictate reality.
[/QUOTE]
So reign would be the correct spelling.
[QUOTE=silenus]
No, no…featherlou is right.
So reign would be the correct spelling.
[/QUOTE]
Oops. Maybe that was Freudian, eh? All hail King Gabe!
To the Op: looks like you should stick to general questions and cafe society.
None of the specific points made in the OP really have to do with taking a message board too seriously.
I’m just saying is all.