I understand each of the words individually, but the manner in which there are assembled, makes no sense.
She is light-years out of my league, but I would if she asked me.
Strange combination of words there. What does it mean?
I’ll say it too: she really doesn’t do much for me. I think she looks pretty good on the show, but still a bit… zaftig to me. I’m attracted to more petite women. Give me Natalie Portman any day of the week. And, in the linked photos, Hendricks is WAY too curvy and plump for my tastes. She does have a pretty face though, I’ll certainly admit that.
Not that I’d stand a chance with her in real life, of course. Or Natalie. Just purely internet ‘sharp knees’ talking, here.
Sorry, not every guy subscribes to “the bigger the boobs the better”. Strange, I know.
There is no such thing as too big natural boobies.
I’m open-minded on these issues. I’d be willing to have sex with Christina Hendricks, Rosario Dawson, Devon Aoki, and Natalie Portman.
For science!
I like science.
It means just what it says. I like small boobies.
I once had a ridiculous argument with a small-breasted girlfriend who refused to believe I was genuine in my appreciation for her minimalist mammaries–this after I had playfully spent some time in bed caressing, naming, and – well, never mind. But she had self-esteem issues.
Maybe she needs exposure to Maria Bamford?
There is at some point, but she’s not to that point.
While I appreciate her curviness, there are lots of curvy women out there, what I like about her specifically is her attitude that she is unapologetic about her shape. That confidence is what’s sexy. Everyone has different shapes. If she’s built like a brick house it’s better (IMO) to celebrate it than go around moaning how much she wishes she was slender.
I’ll send over some hookerbots. Don’t worry about paying; they’ll help themselves to your funds once you’re exhausted.
Oh, sure there is. Hendricks is about two cups too big for my tastes, but she has a stunning face, so I could overlook the oversized boobies. 
A reverse butterface!
As an aside, in that photo-shoot: I love how, when she notices the cameraman, she just smiles and waves. No flipping off the camera, no “Get away, you vultures!”, just “Oh, hi!”.
Now. This might be my memory playing tricks on me. I admit that. But, in that episode of Firefly I don’t remember Saffron being especially large. In fact, she seemed smaller than Inara. I don’t recall hearing many people talking up Morena Baccarin as an example of a large actress. So, did Hendricks gain a lot of weight after the Firefly appearance? Was she filmed to look smaller? Or is my memory playing tricks on me.
I think those pictures of her look bad. But, it’s the outfit, like WOOKINPANUP said. That bathing suit doesn’t go with her color, and does more to accentuate the negatives of her body, than the positives. My gosh. Her boobs are probably nice, but from that bathing suit I would never guess it. Plus. Those knees are so sharp.
I think she looks great in Mad Men. And, I have seen some other candid paparazzi shots were she looked much better than that.
Wow. Rosario Dawson is super hot. I’m bad at judging. Is she heavy compared to most actresses? She looks a lot smaller than Hendricks.
That’s what she blinds me with.
Duhh-nuh-dun Duhh-nuh-dun DUN!
The first time I watched Firefly (on DVD) was pre Mad Men. At the time I had no idea who Christina Hendricks was. I thought the Saffron character was crazy hot and I never noticed her being plus sized. The second time I watched Firefly I had seen MM, was aware that CH was considered to be quite a bit heavier than is typical for a young actress playing a “romantic” lead. This time I DID notice that Saffron was somewhat plump. Not as big as she is now but she was a little “plumper” than Inara or Kaylee.
Still thought she was hot.
She’s gained a lot of weight since her modeling days, when she appeared in Playboy, and some weight since Firefly. By Hollywood standards she’s gigantic - by normal American standards she’s average size, not at all an average shape! She’s said herself that she’s a size 12-14, but it’s all hips and boobs, she has slender arms and shoulders, and relatively thin legs.
I think she has a great body (and face, and skin) and I’m glad to see a woman who isn’t so small and thin as to barely exist in the general population getting so much acclaim and attention for her figure.
I’ve seen these new black swimsuit pics already, and I’m wondering why media outlets have chosen to showcase only those that make her look the heaviest. This and this provide a much more accurate look at her shape and size, but this is all I am seeing on gossip sites! Maybe cause it’s a cleavage shot?
All at once??? :eek:
I’ve wondered this as well.
Because cruelty sells better than fairness, I expect. Because there are many in the media who choose to celebrities through a grinder of humiliation and mockery in order to appeal to the worse natures their viewers and readers.