I thought one of the purposes of ATMB was for discussion of moderator actions. So, why have the last two threads that discuss moderator actions been summarily closed?
I understand that some of the posts arguably crossed the line, but why not a mod note or a warning and then keep the thread open?
They didn’t “arguably cross the line,” the OPs themselves were outright abusive. The well had already been poisoned. ATMB is for civil discussion of moderator actions, not for abuse. If you want to make a complaint, do it in a civil fashion.
But the follow up conversation was civil. Why don’t you all just mod note or warn an OP if you perceive the comment to be abusive and let the discussion continue?
ATMB is the place to politely discuss moderator actions. It is not the place for people to bitch about how much they hate particular members of the moderation staff.
Frank’s post was confrontational, insulting, and impolite right from the start. The thread began as a train wreck and wasn’t getting any better with subsequent comments.
Oliveritaly’s post was similarly confrontational, insulting, and impolite right from the start.
If you want to discuss the moderation of the SDMB in ATMB, those are two really good examples of how not to do it.
If you want to discuss a particular moderation issue, then politely discuss the issue.
Oh, please. Should I cite the threads you have locked before any discussion of moderator action can even happen?
Granted, I don’t have a problem with the locking of Frank’s thread, it was way too personal, but… But damnit Collibri, you are well known, and even vilified, for how you handled the last frou frou among mods rearding the Game Room. I think it would be wiser for you, as a mod, to take a step back.
You cannot bitch about moderator actions in The Pit. You can politely ask questions about moderation in as polite a tone as you’d ask your pastor a question, and you might get an answer depending on what day of the week it is and people’s moods. There’s essentially no way to discuss bad moderation here.
I’d think the argument could be made that one is allowed to bitch about moderator actions in ATMB. It just comes down to how it’s done.
If it’s abusive, pit-style language; then no, it probably will be modded or shut down. …But regular bitching, without name calling or insulting would be okay.
Compare:
“That mod is so fucking stupid, they couldn’t even find their own ass if they had a map. How the fuck does this idiot keep their position?”
with
“That call that was made was complete bullshit. How in the hell did that poster break any rules? That was a serious error in judgement and that mod was so wrong.”
The first is not okay, the second (even though some may define it as “bitching”) would be.
Idle Toughts, I had a thread locked and received a warning for this:
Now, where is the name calling? Where is the insult? Where is the abusive language? It sure as hell is bitching, I admit that, but I was warned for “violating moderator instructions”. I wasn’t warned for an insult or language, I was warned because I posted on a subject. That’s a serious error in judgement and Collibri was wrong to do that.
Here’s what we need: A regularly recurring “Friday mods-stay-away-day”. Every Friday (perhaps for just a designated six- or twelve-hour period) the mods all go out for beer or whatever and the rest of us get to have a mod-free session. No moderation at all during the “happy hours”!
Of course, junior modding by the hoi polloi will run rampant along with all manner of other board violations, there being no real mods to deal with it. (Not that anyone actually has to pay attention to one another’s junior modding, of course.)
So for just one free-wheeling uninhibited session per week, the whole Board’s a Pit!
(It will be just like the weekly Festival on that old Star Trek episode.)
Cite? Seriously. Show me where there was an official instruction posted on the board not to talk about the rule changes in the Game Room. I don’t think you can, but even if you do, I want you to justify why we couldn’t talk about the said rule changes.
Here’s two. (“please let the topic lie without starting any new ATMB threads pro or con.”)
And here was three… told to you specifically before it happened. (“You had said in a previous PM to me that you would continue to open threads in ATMB about this subject, contrary to moderator instructions …” “That would be abuse of the purpose of ATMB, and would justify a warning.”)
(bolding mine)
Three times posters were told not to make any new topics, and one of them was to you specifically… so…I’m not really sure why you’re surprised you got a warning when you did it.
Again, I want you to justify why posters couldn’t talk about it. Maybe, and here’s a thought, you should have been more like Ed and leave complaints about the subject open.
Did Ed issue a warning to Absolute? No, he didn’t, and that was well after my thread.
Because it had already been talked about, across three topics, and didn’t show any signs of slowing down or coming to a resolve. With every solution offered, there was always a group of posters unhappy with it and arguing against it.
So we closed them all and asked nobody to make any more topics about it for the time being as we were going to discuss it.
Now you may not agree with that reasoning or think the reasoning is stupid or useless or nonsensical or whathaveyou…but the point remains that the mods told everyone not to make any new topics.