Clear language from the Mods when giving warnings

[Irishman]

@Superdude

But his posts are successive. JC is the author of both posts 32 and 33. It seems like he’s giving XT a warning for insults, but the insult occurred before his post to knock it off. It comes across to me like he ignored mod instruction, but the infraction was before the mod instruction. After the mod said to stop, there wasn’t an insult, but a warning was issued anyway.

There were three posts of moderation. The first was a Warning to BrightNShiny, with a statement of what the infraction was (insults in GD). The second was a Warning to XT, for the same thing. The third was a directive to the rest of the thread to keep it civil. He could have done them in one post, but breaking it to three posts doesn’t change the meaning. There’s no intent to suggest XT was violating mod instructions, he had already violated the board rule that Jonathan Chance was enforcing.

[tomndebb]

@samclem

Depends on the voltage.

I am fine with low voltage and really high amperage.

[watchwolf49]

WWWWWW

@tomndebb

I am fine with low voltage and really high amperage.

I don’t think you’ll get much amperage through the cords or bluetooth … we’ll need high voltage so we have a chance at arcing the voltage across to the poster.