The Deming PD needs to listen to this guy (the one who has a problem with it, I mean).
His voice?
Well it was Albuquerque. Here’s a picture of the guy.This explains a lot.
Was he driving a truck with an expired emissions inspection tag?
Well, the good news is that by being billed almost $6,000 for a govt anal probe, he may be just able to meet his yearly deductible for an ObamaCare Bronze plan.
No, it wasn’t Albuquerque. It was Deming, hundreds of miles south of Albuquerque on I-10.
Was he sedated, against his will, for the colonoscopy?
Shouldn’t have taken that left turn at Albuquerque.
Dennis Miller? Is that you?
Either that, or they did a colonoscopy, against his will, without sedation. Kind of a win-win for the prosecution.
Amazing. Multiple x-rays, anal penetrations, enemas, forced defecation in front of an audience. On and on, when nothing had been found at any point.
When nothing continued to be found, he was sedated against his will and operated on.
In a county not named on the warrant. After the warrant had expired.
He really deserves a huge payout. And if it gets these cops off the street (please, please), it is money well spent.
“Bring Your Pet To Work Day”?
There has to be more to this story than is reported, and I don’t mean on the victim’s part. I mean the cops and doctors involved, there is more going on here.
YUP! Another man went through the same ordeal with these same cops.
http://www.kob.com/article/stories/S3210356.shtml?cat=500#.Uns7HCe2YyP
I don’t know about that, but “lack of informed consent” is certainly stated in the lawsuit complaint*; as is the tort of “battery,” which, when used in lawsuits involving medical matters, often means that the patient has not given the physician permission to touch the patient. The physicians who performed the procedures, as well as the medical center where they were performed, have been named as defendants.
- The complaint can be found here (warning, PDF).
[QUOTE=grude]
We’ve learned more about that drug dog, Leo, that seems to get it wrong pretty often. He might be getting it wrong because he’s not even certified in New Mexico.
[/QUOTE]
I hate dogs who just make shit up on their resumes. Don’t they think we check ?!
He gave implied consent. He could have prevented the whole chain of events simply by admitting to having invisible/incorporeal drugs in his anus.
Bullshit. Suppose they accused him of hiding drugs in his testicles. Would he then have a choice of going to prison or castration?
You might want to read the second sentence of the quoted post one more time. 
(I assume I’m right about the way I’m reading it, but hey.)
Sorry, it was a joke meant to riff on the argument that a pregnant woman gives implied consent to an ultrasound when seeking an abortion because if she doesn’t consent she can just carry the child to term. It popped into my head when I read Marley23’s post number 26.
To reaffirm, I in no way actually believe that the victim in this case gave any sort of real consent for these procedures.