No, I’m in one of the best graduate programs in the nation and talking about hundreds upon hundreds of peer reviewed journal articles.
And you, on the other hand, are acting like an asshole.
And you’ve still not addressed the points that I’ve refuted. Care to retract your claim about the Taliban?
It doesn’t matter, friend. Arguing with milroyj is somewhat less satisfying than dropping red-hot ingots on your shin, and even more painful. You might as well hold your fire for more worthwhile targets, ones that offer at least a pretense of reasoned resistance.
About the only useful thing one can reply to the spewings of milroyj is :wally
Hey, maybe you can look up each of those words individually, and then study their meanings and then (you might have to think really hard for this one) figure out what they mean as a whole and then (this may require you to lay down for a spell afterwards) reflect on why research of such is significant, even vital.
Or you could just go fuck yourself, which was as valid a reccomendation as any.
FinnAgain: I told you so. A four-page cite fight about something that happened on national fucking television. By the way, milroyj’s total meltdown on page 3 is not to be missed.
Lib:
I think he was deliberately changing mil’s user name in the same way many do in the pit in order to show disdain. (eg. "I’m not even give you the coutesy of writting out your name in full, finnwhatever.)