Co-Worker accused me of being racist...was he right?

If you accidentally tread on someone’s toes, do you apologize?

Depends on their social status relative to mine.

Is that supposed to be a serious answer?

No it is not.

What about the cases like the one described by the OP - in which a person has been stereotyped as a “resident expert” on a foreign country based only on a couple of specious external traits, and it’s the 37th time it’s happened to him this week?

It might be better to think of this not in terms of offense, but in terms of hurt. The OP inflicted an emotional injury on his colleague. Not a big one, but his colleague was probably thinking “oh man, not this shit again.” As @eschrodinger implies, most folks would quickly apologize if they accidentally stepped on their coworker’s toes, but acknowledging being the cause of emotional injury, and accepting responsibility for it, seems to be much harder for some folks.

This is an excellent point–throwing the question toward the dude with a turban may be inappropriate even if he’s got special India expertise, because it might be a different sort of expertise entirely that’s needed to solve the problem.

The flip side possibility is that there is special India expertise that’s required, but that it’s Jenny Powell over there, with her white lady hairdo and white lady clothes, who’s like mmmmikeeeee’s Youtuber; maybe she, unlike the guy with the turban, spent half her childhood in India and knows its culture well enough to answer the question.

Throwing the question open to the room invites whatever expertise from whatever expert can help solve the problem.

Yes, of course. The feelings of people engaging in racist behavior is always more important than the feelings of the people who most endure racist behavior day after day.

That’s the privilege of the ruling class, after all.

Did the OP confirm that it was a group? I’ve not read anything that confirms how many were in the call or what the OP knows about the experience or knowledge of any others present.
If it was a group I personally would have asked it of everyone as a matter of course. That doesn’t mean that what the OP did was unreasonable.

Did you miss the multiple times already where I very clearly commented on that? where I quoted my specific words that address that?

I mean, that’s not even close to true. There are so many things that are worse that being a racist. Almost all the stuff that will actually get you put in jail, for example.

Yes, but I don’t accept that treading on toes is the equivalent of someone taking offence. It is a bad anology.

The correct question to ask is if I apologise and take personal responsibility to rectify the situation whenever someone is offended by something I said, something I do or an opinion I hold.
The answer to that is no, and I would suggest that that holds true for pretty much everyone.
Another correct question to ask is if I expect others to do similar whenever they say or do something that offends me. Again, no.

Do I ever apologise or rectify? Of course. When I think it is warranted and when I’m at fault.

It’s not an analogy for taking offence, but for giving it.

And the reason it’s a useful analogy is that both things can be done either accidentally or on purpose. But in either case, continuing to stand on the toes after being informed that one’s doing so can only be done on purpose.

It’s not just about feelings. Accusing someone of being racist can get someone fired, so when you make the accusation, be damn certain that the person is a racist. Not just someone with a clumsy way of expressing thoughts.

Just the accusation? Yeah right. I’ve never seen that happen where there wasn’t documented evidence.

And if there’s documented evidence, what’s the debate?

If you say someone is an embezzler, I guarantee that the level of social revulsion and public shaming will not equal that of someone tagged as a racist. A drug dealer will not be as viscerally hated as a racist. Racists are seen as horrible, horrible people. Why otherwise would the charge be so vociferously denied for even the slightest suggestion of guilt?

Are we still even talking about the OP here? He may have said something a bit racist but he’s not exactly David Duke.

Anyway, having thought about this thread a little over the last day or so, there’s some positive points I want to put forward.

  1. The OP at least was curious enough about this to ask when they could have reflexively denied the charge. I hope they’ve at least taken enough from this to understand the point of view they asked about.

  2. The Sikh man in the OP. He could have kept his head down, but he chose to speak out about being racially stereotyped.

  3. All the people that explained their lived experience of low level racism and kept their patience, especially Acsenray. You’re a lot more polite than I would manage.

Can you give an example of someone who lost their job or had other serious consequences for merely being called a racist, with no examples of any racist behavior? In the OP’s case, he isn’t being called a racist, his co-worker merely said that a thing he said was racist.

Do you see that sort of social revulsion and public shaming happening in this thread? Do you think the OP is being treated worse for talking about how he said something kind of racist, then he would if he came in here and admitted to cleaning out his company’s pension fund?

Thanks. This is accurate. Also, the number of responses here is also just overwhelming.

I don’t think there would’ve been 300 responses if he had.