Pretty impressive in a way, really. Negative points for not including support for fluffy kittens, cute babies, and baby seals.
If you can’t figure out that this is incredibly inappropriate by the time that you are 18, then you have no reason to be outside of your own house, let alone in college. There is a time and place for everything. A creative writing assignment is NOT the time, place, and method to tell your teacher that you are attracted to her. I’m comfortable with saying that you should not hit on your professor while taking his or her class.
Actually, this was impressive.
[QUOTE=Boo Boo Foo]
That said, in my experience, women who know they’re hot tend to be pains in the ass because they think every guy in the world only wants to talk to them for one reason. And they tend to be VERY condescending.
[/QUOTE]
The way you made that sweeping generalization…a thing of beauty. You made your point with just the right amount of mysogyny. Actually, I think you were a little light on the stereotyping. You should have added that hot women aren’t that good in bed either because they think they can just rely on being hot.
“Pains in the ass”, is that multiple pains in one ass?
Snopes says it is false.
I am pretty impressed by Boo Boo Foo, and not just by the multiple-armed being on every side at once. So hot women are pain in the asses because they think every guy is interested in only one thing. Yet in this very thread men are saying they should be allowed to express their sexual attraction to any woman, any time, any how. So…basically, the hot women have a point?
FTR, I am neither a professor nor a hot woman, so I make no sweeping proclamations on whether the lady’s hotness would be an opinion or a fact. BUT, you don’t have to be hot to be sick of being hit on everywhere you go!
(bolding mine)
Well, 5 out of 5 on *that *rubric… 
Well, Snopes is wrong because I’ve seen the segment on TV, within the last year. Maybe the film wasn’t available at the time the Snopes article was written because I would suspect it didn’t air.
There was another game show event – on “The Newlywed Game” in which a contestant answered a question about the most unusual place she had made whoopee with “in the butt.” For years they denied it happened until they actually released the video to be used in a clip show. Probably the same show that had the Groucho footage
I’m sure that the reason hot women give Boo Boo Foo the brush off is because they just do that to everyone. Yeah, that’s totally it…
In post #45 I stated clearly that I thought he crossed a line when he used his essay to express sexual interest in the teacher when he (presumably) had no indication that such an expression would be welcomed by her. So we are in agreement here.
This is a minor side issue to the subject under discussion. I guess I was tired of reading posts by various dopers who sounded like ignorant old fogies to whom anything relating to sex was too awful to be presented in a mere COLLEGE COURSE for ADULTS. Clearly, writing about sex well is a part of writing generally, and given that it is so often done so badly you’d think there might be some usefulness in instruction, but some people apparently never grow up where sex is concerned.
I’ve seen images of both the man and the teacher involved in this affair, and while the teacher is only ordinary pretty, not Hollywood pretty, the man involved is butt-ugly,and not just because he’s 57 years old, though that is no help. So I suspect that some aspect of lookism may be involved here, the teacher repulsed because the man who wrote the offending piece is so fugly, and the man wrote the piece out of what may have been a “hell, why not?” approach caused by a general feeling that women are not sexually attracted to him.
Kinda feels like there might be an 800-pound gorilla in the room that no one dare speak about. So consider it spoken about.
“Corlett said students in the English 380 class were told to write honestly and that no topic was off limits.” Maybe she shouldn’t say that any more.
Except that actually it probably has more to do with the fact that in addition to writing and saying sexually inappropriate things, the dude was also jazzed enough about guns that he apparently mentioned his license to carry during his class introduction speech.
I’m not seeing any angle here other than that this dude presented as a socially dysfunctional and potentially dangerous individual who was justifiably asked to leave.
Like so many of our very own Teeming Millions!
That man is not butt-ugly. Not by a long shot. I don’t think Robert Redford needs to worry, but that doesn’t even approach plain ugly.
This article on Jezebeldoes not present a lot of information supporting the “gun nut” aspect of the controversy, and believe me, they’d have given out more if they had more. Sounds blown up out of proportion to me, more like the teacher had a gun phobia.
I’d say the squinty little eyes and big jowls and the turned-down, prissy little mouth qualify him as butt-ugly. But tastes do vary, I guess.
Cosign.
When I was 19 I wrote an erotic story about my history teacher in my English note book. I was in college and I had a crush on him but I had the good sense of destroying the story AND NOT turning it in.
His behavior was inappropriate and there is no excuse for his behavior.
lol
The guntro story came from one of this guy’s classmates, and I’m not sure why you think the journalist would find it prudent to reveal their name. It is certainly consistent with the instructor’s explicit mention of a concern about guns in her complaint statement, and it is a matter of public record (see the second letter on this page) the man in question was indeed prone to blorting off about guns and how much he thinks it should be allowed to carry them around. Given these facts, I’d say it seems pretty silly to propose that the student and teacher conspired together to fabricate tales that coincidentally both reference this dude’s spirited, outspoken enthusiasm for personal firearm carrying.
But, hey, you think he’s an ugly dude and everyone knows that women hate guys who you think are ugly dudes so I bet that totally must be how it all went down!
Perhaps you should take your own advice.
I am no fan of guns, but there was nothing in Corlett’s letter that read like an unbalanced mind making wild assertions. Frankly, if his letter were a post on the Dope it would be one of the better ones. He stuck to law and the facts. He thinks he SHOULD be allowed to carry a gun on campus, which I don’t think is a good idea for anyone, but there’s nothing in his assertions that seems the least bit wild-eyed or off-balance.
I think women are generally more attracted to better looking men, just as men are more attracted to better looking women, but standards of beauty do vary and other factors come into play. I get by on charm mostly, myself! Well, that and a sense of humor. I’m willing to let the readers of the board look at the pics and make up their own minds on the topic.