And so did Washington! Oregon said no, but still, two states! California, you’re next, right?
It should just never have been illegal in the first place. It’s incredible what people used to believe, and some still do. That it would lead to heroin. That it was on the same level as heroin. That it made you a sex maniac. That possession was worth five or more years in prison. Such rage against a substance that makes people feel so mellow.
How come Washington and Colorado did but not Oregon? Going by general reputation, you’d expect Oregon to be more likely to legalize pot than Wash and Colorado.
Could the fed succeed in making it a federal crime to produce/purchase/consume, even if purely within Wash or Colorado?
Well, they’re lucky Obama won, or else things would almost certainly have gotten very messy with the Feds under Romney. Now that Obama doesn’t have to worry about reelection, it sure will be interesting to see how this goes down.
With legalization in Colorado and Washington, it will be interesting to see how they handle regulation. Of particular interest will be how well they handle the almost unavoidable mass diversion to other states. Since it will be taxed to heck within both states, there will be built-in incentive to divert product out to states where not only can it be sold tax-free, but where street prices will probably be much higher.
There will almost certainly be a lot of issues arising from all that, and it will bring a lot of pressure for it to be addressed at the Federal level, one way or the other.
A recent study by a Mexican think tank estimates that Mexican drug cartels could lose up to 30% of their revenue from the US (over $3 billion) for this very reason.
They conclude that if it were legal in any one of the three states there would be enough leaking out to every other state to pretty much eliminate the market for smuggling it to the US from Mexico.
This leaves the question who would be in charge of smuggling operations within the US - chances are they won’t be much nicer people than cartels. If the human costs of the US appetite for weed are paid closer to home and in the US news every night, it will probably get a response at the federal level very quickly one way or the other.
Fantastic! I’d like to see B.C. follow suit, and end criminal control of the enterprise in that province. OTOH, our yearly riding at Silverstar and Whistler might just get a bit more dangerous.
Hopefully any fallout like that Crazyhorse mentions will expand rather than stifle this.
I’ve wondered how something like this might go down. I’m actually surprised to see it get passed this election cycle. I thought it would be many more years before a state (let alone two!) would actually legalize it.
I’m thinking the Feds wouldn’t get involved unless it became a Federal issue. Trafficking between state lines, perhaps?
I wonder if many states, if not all, might eventually follow suit.
I have often wondered :why do people need a drug to be happy, why not find pleasure in small things,like seeing the smile of a small baby, beautiful sunset etc. To me seeing others happy is feeling good about life and I try every way I can to do this. One can grow by going outside of one’s own self and like an old song: Accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative, and don’t mess with Mr in-between!
I think someone was looking for the “philosophically debate the merits of psychoactive substances” thread, not the “is it moral to prohibit victimless crimes” thread.
Baby smiles and sunsets are only available at certain times of the day. Other things that can make you happy (chocolate, sex, humor, pot etc) are often found more on-demand.
There have been larger crackdowns on medical marijuana in Colorado under the Obama administration than under Bush. I have no explanation for this. It’s not clear to me if it’s the US Attorney acting without direction from the administration, or if the federal government’s position and actions in the last year are directed from the top.
It will be interesting in Colorado. My guess is that local police won’t arrest/ticket people who just happen to be holding under the allowed amount. However, I can see the Feds raiding grow operations which though complying with local laws, are big enough to come to their attention.
I’m guessing that Oregon’s ups-and-downs regarding weed are purely political. I lived in Portland in 87, and it was decriminalized: a person could have an ounce of weed on his person or property, and it was a 500 dollar fine. One I doubt was ever enforced, unless someone was being a dick and the cop had had enough. We were pulled over once with a very smelly, juicy quarter in our glovebox, and the cop didn’t care; just said “It’s under an ounce, right?”.
I had to go look up what happened, and I guess it got recriminalized in 97…right when I left Oregon, hehe. My timing is good
But yeah, I’m sure there was some political reason it got re-criminalized, and a political reason it’s still that way. One thing I am quite sure of is that it has nothing to do with what the population there actually WANTS. It’s all politics. (Which USED to be about what the population wanted, right?)
The feds can either look the other way in CO and WA, and let us govern ourselves (states rights, right?) or they can argue to override the new state-level legislation on the grounds of…what…that only drug cartels should have the right to sell & distribute the stuff? It’s time for the feds to withdraw on this subject, and two states standing up for themselves is a great time to do it without losing face: “Well, if this is the will of the people, then so be it.”
Oh, and fireworks stands on the borders of some states as well as Indian Reservations are not uncommon. The rule is–light 'em off here or risk Johnny Law if you light 'em off at home. There was some low-level smuggling, but on the whole the only ones hurt were the morons who held on to an M80 for too long.