how the fuck did i bait you? if you were reading and not skimming you would have never made your post. bananas and peanut butter, fcs.
shoot, if calling someone out on a total misquote and mischaracterization about a post that someone else made is scummy then shoot.
you made it more complicated, not me. what up? sheesh anyone who reads the thread will see that. obfuscation and bullshit are not real highly desired traits in someone working for a town win.
and i am so inclined to give you a pass since apparently we are on total different wave lengths that the peek has to take a think.
Saying something is a nulltell is hardly an eager defense of the player. He’s saying it’s irrelevant, and I think he’s right.
I personally don’t think peeker WAS acting like an ass. Being an aggressive player is a common and acceptable form of play in mafia. If anything, you’re the one prolonging this discussion.
To keep this on track- do you think peeker is scum? If so, do you have anything else besides aggressive style of play that makes you think so?
“Is this player playing within his (or her) normal style?” is an important question when trying to sort out scum tells and decide if someone’s behavior is scummy. We got Chronos in the last game in large part because his behavior was off.
We’re not here to run a Mafia finishing school, we’re here to kill scum.
Which is why I also referred to your mislynch in Lost Mafia for coming down too hard on an aggressive player.
I think people are cutting him entirely too much slack. Okay, maybe I’m making too much of that miller thing, but it just seems like all he does is kind of fire wildly at random people who might very well be innocent and everyone sticks up for him because that’s just how he plays. Whereas I don’t think I’ve been remotely aggressive or scummy and I think I’ve raised good points and people are acting like I’m behaving suspiciously. It just makes me think people are defending peeker for the wrong reasons is all.
i never said anything about lynching a miller. why the heck do you keep bring up your mistake and blaming it on me?
i don’t think anyone is being very defensive of me fgs. matter of fact let’s just assume that everyone that hasn’t fallen down your position is teamed with me as scum and are deliberately trying to make me look good and you bad. uh, there’d be a heck of a lot more than four scum at this point.
how am i being an “ass”? i know that you mischaracterized and quoted what i said. so i am in your grill for you to say you were wrong. you were skimming and not reading for content? shoot, iv’e done the same thing in the past and when i was wrong promptly admitted it.
sheesh.
once upon a time there was a land where everyone played together and all the children were above intelligence and appearance. crap, i like you freud but your position is getting tenuous at best.
That would mean operating on the assumption that the scum role PMs included information as to the identities AND roles of the other scum players. Otherwise, how would the not-so-covert message be of any use if they don’t know which of themselves is the roleblocker? Do we know or not if that is how the scum PMs were delivered?
If the scum are not yet aware of role distribution amongst their faction, I can’t see a compelling reason for scum to risk attempting covert communication like that in broad Day 1 Daylight.
And to come full circle in my “null tell” assessment of that statement, he could be a townie dangling that out to see if there might be a newbie scum tempted to nibble at the bait.
NETA: Sorry, this was in response to Rin’s post #239 regarding the amrussel statement (and a response to Zeriel by extension). And I see that Guiri and I are on the same page.
ok, freud let me lay it out for you and the rest of the town.
i don’t know that anyone cuts me slack. matter of fact my shelf life is about the same as shrimp on a hot day. i am scum’s worst nightmare because i agitate.
i will definitely go after anyone for what i think non town motivated reasons. in the big dog world (glad to see you there tom) this is gloves off. if you are innocent then state your case. i am always reasonable. but if your good points are bringing up stuff that i never said, i am sorry, but we will have to disagree.
does that make any sense freud?
and btw, i never fire random. my wife, olin, would take away my driver.