Doh! I was not rocketing our own Biggirl up above all the players in this mess to the heights of skanktified super-skankdom, as my poor coding would indicate. I was agreeing with her that Rick is the skankiest of them all!
**
:rolleyes:
I hope this is the last time you go off on people based on nothing more than your own ignorance, naivete and misguided moral indignation but I doubt it. I too saw the tape, she was not raped (duh, it was her boyfriend*), she spent too much time preening for the camera for it to be rape.
- I realize this is exactly the kind of board where this remark will tempt someone to lecture me about how it is perfectly possible to be raped by one’s boyfriend. And it is, but it’s a stupid assumption :rolleyes:. So save it.
Let me correct myself before somebody else does: La Liz’s first husband was actually the granduncle of Miss Nicky, the brother of her paternal grandfather.
Maybe he was trying to re-enact the feeling of being in Camilla Parkers bowels?
::raises hand::
Well I’ve seen the video. The NY Post obviously didn’t see the real one.
This is hysterical b/c the whole video kinda has this “raccoon eyes staring at night vision goggles” look to it. At times you can only see the white glare from their eyes - hers and Rick Solomon’s.
It’s very dark and there’s no way any drooling could possibly be visible. And if there’s drool it’s b/c she’s truly enjoying herself.
Uh-huh. She moved around quite easily from what I could see. In other words, she was quite receptive to his direction.
As for the whole “she was so out of it that it’s the equivalent of rape” defense:
A scene at the end of the video shows her happily sucking his dick for a while, occasionally stopping to smile directly into the lens and adjust the camera angle.
Kinda negates that whole argument.
I just saw it too, Dooku. And you’re absolutely right. In fact, there is a news article that agrees with you… it’s an op ed… and I would be able to find it if the madonnamad board wasn’t down, which it is. I tried googling, but no luck.
Anyway, it said that the Hilton parents should be proud of Paris, because she is acting just the way they raised her to - fame through infamy. The author says mom and pop should have bought them soccer uniforms when they were 14, instead of miniskirts.
Yup, saw the alleged video too, what Dooku and kung fu lola said, a rape victim doesnt usually get up to answer her cell phone does she?
That’s no excuse. “Officé DePot” would be a stupid name for a kid, even if she’s the heiress to the Office Depot billions, and “Paris Hilton” is no better. If your last name is a major hotel chain, you’d be wise to avoid first names that are the names of cities or airports–unless, of course, you’re so rich that you’re above embarrassment, which seems to be the case here.
What’s next? Walt Disney’s great great grandson, Wonderfulworldof Disney?
Here is the article, as posted on another MB (if this violates the rules about reproducing articles on SDMB, please kill the link).
Here are some excerpts, just in case;
"*And despite the spin that her family’s lawyers are putting on it, Paris, the airhead heiress not only does not appear to be out of it, she’s clearly very much into it.
Yes, the girl who put the “lite” in socialite looks like a willing, eager and hardly camera-shy participant.
She is, (and it is), without a doubt, a parent’s worst nightmare. Well, unless of course you are Paris’ parents, Kathy and Rick Hilton - then maybe you’re living the dream.*"
“Where the hell have you been since your two daughters were running wild at 14? How did you allow them out to go clubbing and looking all sexed-up at an age when they should have been home with you having dinner and doing homework?”
"*Paris Hilton, (the girl, not the hotel) was, in a sentence, raised to be famous for being famous for accomplishing exactly nothing. Exciting. Exploited. Extreme. Embarrassing. But never disappointing. Like an F. Scott Fitzgerald socialite - all grease and no machinery.
And who are the parents mad at now? Solomon - not their daughter for participating, nor themselves for letting it get this far. Right.
In Solomon’s ugly video, pathetic Paris stays true to her true calling, getting her face, and every other part of her, in front of the camera.
When Solomon asks her which of them is on camera, she gleefully purrs, “Me!” proving that most dangerous place on the planet is between Paris Hilton and a camera.*"
Re: rape due to intoxicaton…
In some states, the legal definition of rape includes the rapist being a person who is part of a sex act who isn’t intoxicated while the other is. So, depending upon the laws of the area where this was taped, it could technically be called rape, but I personally wouldn’t call it anything more than an ex trying to get a little revenge and make a little money in the process. Either label for the case makes it a slimeball occurrence.
So, erm, since this has happened in addition to Pam and Tommy’s video being released through the internet… is anyone actually seriously thinking that making home movies with your lover is a good idea anymore? ::rolls eyes::
Mr. Rilch and I once used our digital video camera for this purpose. After he turned it on, but before we started, I sat up, pointed at the camera, and said, “If anyone other than us is watching this, you should be ashamed. Not us.”
If I give you my mailoing address, will you…
What?
:::D&R::::
I edited that part out before I uploaded it 
Too rich to be raped? NO. Too rich to have not already made the guy disappear if there ever was a real rape? Yes. The real moral to this story is: don’t make private videos with sleazy Hollywood producer “studs” that also manage “legal” internet gambling operations. Shannon, you really picked a winner.
I saw the video too. She’s completely alert and coherent through the whole thing. At one point she gets up to answer the phone. Then she…well…let’s just say she looks like she knew what she was doing. :o
Because of this mental image, I must now pound a railroad spike through my skull.
Just saw it. I see no reason at all to think she was imparied in any way.
So, who wants to bet this thread isn’t going the way the OP wanted.
Imagine, all that wasted morally outraged indignation. The horror!
Even if she was drunk, the idiot OP was flaming people who wouldn’t have known that she was.
It’s like if a bunch of guys were admiring a photo of what appeared to be beautiful adult woman, but it turned out to be a 15 year old boy in drag. Would it be justified to call the guys pedophiles, when they had no idea it was not an adult woman?
Now it looks like there were at least 10 tapes.