Money, the Dollar Almighty. That is his strength, and that is his weakness. Pull the thread on his business loans, and the sweater unravels. Let him know, quietly and deniably, that if he resigns in order to spend more time with his family, the pressure will lessen. Otherwise, every irregularity, every hinky-dinky deal, will get the sunlight treatment.
Then, hi-ho, hi-ho, its off to court we go! Where, we will hint, the most stringent and ruinous penalties will be applied. A few million here, a few million there, it begins to add up to real money. Especially if Il Douche is not as rich as he pretends to be.
He’s always been rich, he has no idea what it like to be poor, or even just not-rich. He’s never filled his own gas tank, never shopped at Piggly Wiggly with the lumpenprole.. Death doesn’t scare him as much as not-rich.
Follow the money, threaten to take it away, and he will cave.
From a factual standpoint, can anyone enlighten me as to what happens if the FBI probe identifies undeniable criminal activity that the House still won’t impeach for? Can the president be a defendant in court in a criminal prosecution? At some point, it has to be out of the House Republican’s hands, no?
Articles have to be passed by a majority of the House Judiciary Committee, so the Committee chairman has to be on board. Then, the Speaker would have to schedule it for a vote by the full House. So, there are two separate chokepoints. But realistically, the House Judiciary chairman is not going to allow any articles to be considered at all unless the rest of the leadership already consented.
After the election results, I am not predicting anything for a good long time, but I’d love to hear such testimony! I may even take the day off of work to watch it.
Two reasons. As a LEO, he knows that such a case would be very difficult to prove. And secondly, he knows that such a charge against a sitting president is a political act, and as such is up to Congress to do.
Comey need not state conclusions about whether what the President did might constitute a crime. Just like witnesses at a trial don’t need to say, “The defendant took my personal property, thereby committing theft in the third degree!”
Comey has an opportunity to simply say what Trump told him. He doesn’t need to testify that what Trump told him constitutes a crime: it’s up to others to judge that. But I don’t know what Comey will say during his testimony. I can see a scenario that he would lay everything out on the table, and another scenario that he keeps certain parts of the story private.