Who invented oral sex?
Oral Roberts. Before he found the Lord.
I though it was his brother, Anal Roberts who invented it. 
I had a severe anal hershiser once, and had to have surgery.
Hershey is supposed to melt in your mouth. The resemblance to Ex-Lax is superficial.
(Aside: I wonder if anyone else had a grandmother who believed that constipation was the single most insidious threat to pediatric health?)
In the middle of a Broadway play, the leading actor suddenly collapsed on the stage. The curtains were hurriedly closed. After a few moments, the manager came out and addressed the audience: “Ladies and gentlemen, I am very sorry. Our lead actor has . . . has died. We cannot continue this play. We will refund your money.”
One old Jewish lady in the audience cried out, “Give him an enema!”
“Erm . . . perhaps you didn’t hear me. The man is dead.”
"Give . . . him . . . an . . . enema!"
“Madame, he’s dead! An enema wouldn’t help!”
“It couldn’t hurt!”
Arktangent
I wonder if part of their hatred of Einstein is because he was a passionate advocate for world government – eliminating the world’s arbitrary nation-state boundaries, and with them the ignorant abomination known as “patriotism.”
I think they hate him ever since they got a “C” in high school science.
(“But if I’m going 9/10 of the speed of light, and shoot a rocket that goes 9/10 of the speed of light, how come…?”)
These are the kind of people who don’t comprehend square roots. Conservative thinking rejects the idea that there might be two right answers to a question.
So did Einstein, I believe.
No, that’s a myth. Einstein himself used to laugh about the rumors that he had been a poor student. In reality, he had been at the head of his class and took advanced courses.
I agree. I suspect a lot of the dumb stuff you can find at Conservapedia is planted there by pranksters trying to see how outrageous a lie they can submit and still get believed. But my sympathy for the targets of their humor is alleviated by the fact they do believe these lies.
I’m half tempted to create an entry on how science has once-and-for-all proven that gay marriage is wrong.
That article is exactly what conservapedia was made for.
It was funny that the report it links to shows that the “researcher” lives in Godwin way.
Just as I expected, that yahoo may had been good with physics and chemistry, but he is going to different fields and he admits that he has started with a preconceived notion and has not published his research in a recognized scientific journal. Not very likely to see that, nor the “respect around the world” that he reports.
As for the OP, one thing to notice is how in the references of the conservapedia entry they mention that the “liberally based Wikipedia” does not allow a single criticism of Einstein’s theory, but in reality there is an entry on the Brans-Dicke theory that is very fair in a different article.