Fine. That’s your opinion. Don’t state it like it’s a fact.
Unexplainable to you. Maybe you’re not sure of yourself, and therefore maybe all of your insistence here is more likely to be an attempt at reassuring yourself, than convincing anybody else.
I’m don’t particularly care if it happened or not. Based on some of your other posts it’s as likely as not that it never happened, but I’ll assume it did. I respect your friends beliefs and wouldn’t try to change them. On the other hand, if he asked me if there was a rational explanation, I might just have one for him.
As to how frequently it happens…
CITE???
(And FTR, I don’t have any sort of story like that myself.)
I think I’m going to petition for a new “fallacy”, I’m going to label it the “theory fallacy”.
That is NOT why they call it the theory of evolution. It is NOT an assumption.
I bet your just itching to throw out the “if it were so factual why isn’t it a law”, line aren’t you.
You sir, do not know what scientific theory means.
Meatros, posts like that one are also why I personally draw a distinction between “truth” and “fact.”
Different people believe in different things and to each of them those things are “truth.”
“Facts” on the other hand are indesputable.
Lekatt has his own “truth,” which is completely at odds with “facts.”
The words you post are not mine, you put words in my posts that are not there. Easy to criticize someone on information you make up.
Love
Leroy
The words that I post are yours, I put no words in your posts that are not there. It is easy to criticise someone on information that is recorded in this thread and I do not make up.
Maybe not, but I do know that evolution has not been proven.
Prove it. Show the posts where I said those things.
Love
Leroy
Every time you deny what is patently obvious from reading this thread, your credibility goes down another notch (if it isn’t at rock bottom already). Every time you say again that you did not say what page 6 of this thread shows that you did, you lie once again.
As I’ve said before, never have I seen someone mount such a sustained attack on their own credibilty as you are doing.
I have done this ad nauseum. You just ignore what I post, do not explain yourself and do not deny. For a few pages. And then, once again, you make the same tired lies and I refute them and then you expect that I dig out the old quotes once again.
The only kind interpretation I can put on this is that you have a short memory. If I was less charitable I would suggest that you follow this pattern deliberately, hoping that those who are lately come to this thread will not know which of us is telling the truth, and will not be bothered to find out.
----You are wrong. People who are honest, don’t expect something for nothing.—
You must mean something other than “honest” when you use the word “honest” then. Because the definition of “honest” doesn’t include “skeptical of deals that offer something for nothing.”
—When a “deal” is offered that is not fair in every way, the red flag will go up, and the deal will be ignored.—
What does this have to do with being honest? It seems more to do with demanding that OTHER people be honest: and that they prove their honesty. While that’s a great policy, you seem to be advocating something beyond simple personal honesty here.
----This is common sense and has been taught for generations that I know of. The old saying is “You can’t cheat an honest man.” It works only if the person is honest, however.—
Ah, so if it doesn’t work, then the person wasn’t REALLY honest, right?
The old saying is “If you break a mirror, seven years bad luck will result!”
Lekatt what would you accept as evidence that JVP is a fake?
You keep making accusations, but offer no proof?
Show me exactly where I lied, I know I didn’t.
Lekatt - you keeping making claims that your words were twisted, changed, taken out of context, misunderstood, yada yada. But you don’t bother posting the message id #s, or, if that’s too hard, the dates. Please - do a little of the work to support your case.
is strong, indeed.
It’s been interesting, folks, in a certain way, but my job has just very suddenly, but not entirely unexpectedly, become hectic, and probably won’t give me the time to come back here to be really active in this thread. I hope I can check back in from time to time.
Cheers.
I hope so too. Stay well.
Cheers
That is, as you know, not what I said. What I said was that you have been offered the proof several times before. You just keep pretending you haven’t and asking for it again a few pages later.
I’m not interested in playing that game. Your memory problems are your own.
[Paxman]
Leroy, what would you accept as evidence that JVP is a fake?
[/Paxman]