I personally would not take any action based on this, except that I want rules enforced consistently. Probably the desire to see rules enforced consistently is merely another h bastion of my mouthpieciness of white supremacy.
What I am really seeking by making this post is a clear understanding of what constitutes hate speech. This (“House Pochos”) seems a clear negative shot at my racial and ethnic ancestry; a variant of “House (n-word),” the similar derisive term for a black person insufficiently supportive of black issues as determined by the left.
FWIW I find it grotesque and would be absolutely fine with this sort of smear being modded with (or for) extreme prejudice. The point Huey is making is also a nasty point, but it can be made without smears if it needs to be made at all.
And, yeah, that certainly seems like hate speech to me. Hate speech and ignorant speech since the term is used against Mexicans, and Bricker isn’t Mexican. Sort of like calling someone of Korean heritage a “Chinaman”. Some definitions of “hate speech” require it to insight violence, so if that is the definition, let’s just go with “ethnic slur”.
Well, the point of calling a black person that name is that he or she has already reached a determination of the issues, so I don’t agree that “as determined by black people.” SOME black people obviously don’t share that determination, inasmuch as an actual black person is the subject of the attack.
In other words, I don’t wish to see mod action directed against the poster; I want to understand what we believe hate speech to be and thought this an excellent exemplar of the possible contours of the definition.
But isn’t it for the mods to decide what is hate speech and whether it should be regulated? Switching the complaint from a private report there to a public thread here just means that you have delayed when the mods hear about the incident.
No, it’s insufficiently supportive of black issues as determined by Huey Freeman. And I’m not going to defend the racist things that Huey Freeman says. But don’t put the blame for his racist remarks on anyone else.
I’m not interested, he said for the third time, in having the mods take action, so a delay in the mods hearing about it is not a concern that I would particularly harbor. I’m interested in the reaction of the hoi polloi, the unwashed masses, the Teeming Millions that post here, because I believe that this discussion would be helpful in my understanding of how to determine whether a particular exemplar is in fact hate speech. A reported post may result in a warning, a note, or a non-action by a mod, but would not likely be accompanied by a rich discussion of the nuances such as may possibly develop here.
Personally, my guess is that rules in a sticky is flatly impossible. This thread is a perfect example of why. A word was used that almost everybody had to look up. Here’s the top definition on Urban Dictionary.
How do craft a rule against all such words? A rule merely against ethnic slurs is meaningless. Comments on Others come in a vast spectrum, from utter vileness to humorous exaggeration. They cannot be treated equally, nor should they. And what do you propose the rule would say? That any use earns a warning? A ban? A mod note? Double secret probation? That only certain words do? Does the poster’s ethnicity matters? What about the context of the post? Does it matter is the thread is in the Pit? How about a point system?
My judgment call is that pocho should be modded. But since the OP explicitly says that’s not what he wants, I’m at a loss. As someone who is noted for parsing laws down to the last punctuation mark, he is our exemplar of why no general rule or set of them can encompass situations like this, nor does he give any indication at all what he would want to happen if the rule should exist.
Bricker, if you want a discussion of the nuances, start one. Don’t sit back and force others to state their opinions so you can later pick them apart. Lay out exactly what you think hate speech encompasses, how the mods should deal with it, and all the other issues that such rules would entail. Then we can respond knowledgeably rather than in the current fog.