Controversial encounters between law-enforcement and civilians - the omnibus thread #2

Ugh. There are so many to be disgusted with; my mind boggles:

Remember, it’s just a few bad apples. Or a half dozen bad apples in this instance. Too bad there wasn’t one good apple in that bunch to stop the bad apples. It’s almost like the saying should be flipped to “it’s just a few good apples.”

Because he might shoot back?

Instead of apples, it’s more like they are potatoes and we are currently going through the Irish Potato Famine.

Good news, everyone!

ETA: Hey! I have cake! Mmmmmmmm cake.

Trust the forensics, trust the science!

eh…not so much…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/director-of-dcs-troubled-crime-lab-resigns-after-scathing-audit-report/ar-AAKaWFV?li=BBnb7Kz

Cops lie, and lie, and lie.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/all-of-this-was-kept-secret-video-of-deadly-arrest-of-ronald-greene-obtained-by-ap/vi-AAKb5kU

Georgetown Professor Rosa Brooks talks about what she experienced working as a LEO and the correlation between what is wrong with policing and what is wrong with society in general. (She wrote Tangled Up in Blue: Policing in America’s Cities about the experience.)

Back to the 73 year-old woman with dementia, in Northern Colorado.

https://www.9news.com/article/news/investigations/loveland-police-alzheimers-training/73-de14215c-3b68-4526-ac9d-acb186ac07f3

The Loveland Police Department (LPD) will now be requiring officers to complete training on interacting with people with Alzheimer’s or any other form of dementia after an alleged incident of excessive force involving a 73-year-old woman surfaced earlier this week.

This isn’t the way I’d like us to go about this. It’s a token meant to appease the community.

There are a nearly infinite number of issues that LEOs might confront. Assessing whether or not there’s a serious threat is probably job one. I’m not sure that job is being done well by PDs, generally.

But once it’s determined that the person you’re trying to contact doesn’t pose a serious and/or immediate threat, I don’t think job two is to come to a clinical diagnosis. I think it’s far more important to decide whether there may be something going on with the person, at the time, that’s affecting their ability to act as you expect them to act.

But we won’t solve this problem ‘condition’ or ‘disorder’ by condition or disorder. Nor should we. I don’t think we need LEOs coming to exact ICD-10 or DSM-V diagnoses.

It still comes back to basic screening, hiring, and ongoing training, and not just turning armed sociopaths loose on unsuspecting communities, only to gloat among themselves about how cruel they were to the most vulnerable members of our population.

To bolster the case:

This one’s horrible (, too). And – like the woman with dementia – was followed by text messages by other LEOs that provide important and disturbing visibility into their states of mind.

We have to end the oh-so-American habit of superficially addressing the symptom, and start looking into the numerous and corrosive root causes.

For many of these interactions, it seems that police follow a flow chart like this:

Is the person
doing what I    ---Yes---> [Do whatever, good or bad]
want them too?         
      |
     No
      |
      v
 Use violence

As if to illustrate:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/video-shackled-black-man-ordered-facedown-in-deadly-arrest/ar-AAKf6Lc?li=BBorjTa

The footage and the autopsy report add to the growing wealth of details about Greene’s death, which has long been surrounded by allegations of a cover-up and is now the subject of a federal civil rights investigation. Louisiana State Police initially blamed his death on a car crash and made no mention of use of force by officers.

It also noted he had high levels of cocaine and alcohol in his system as well as a broken breastbone and a torn aorta.

Broken breastbone and torn aorta. As well has tasering and 'beating the ever-living fuck out him", to quote the cop who did it.

These cops are far more dangerous to society than the alleged ‘criminals’ they pretend to chase.

You left a part out

Combat veteran? 25 year career in law enforcement? Pfftt; who cares?

Well, maybe the SCOTUS does. Maybe.

Well, the police interact with serious cases of mental illness very frequently. So they need substantial training not only about dementia but all forms of mental illness.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/body-camera-footage-released-showing-incident-in-which-police-mistook-daughters-ashes-for-drugs/ar-AAKfFVy?li=BBnb7Kz

Six Officers. SIX OFFICERS for a non-confrontation traffic stop. Let me guess. He is black?

A jury trial for the case is scheduled to begin in August 2022.

I’m really hoping that is a typo - but I guess the courts may be backed up that far for civil jury trials.

He had cannabis in the car. He admitted it to the first officer. So the officer called five of his friends over to have a search party. Or whatever they call it. Yeehaw! Where’s the #8 crowbar?

SCOTUS: Nope: nobody cares! Fuck you!

It turns out that the top cop present at Ronald Greene’s killing lied for almost 2 years about the existence of his body cam footage: