Also don’t forget that if a person was somehow trapped in a situation with a crying baby and the crying was really getting on their nerves, killing the baby would be justified.
Well…
She believes it justified if the father kills the woman if she becomes pregnant and won’t abort.
ZPG Zealot, meet irony. Irony, ZPG Zealot. I see the two of you have a lot of catching up to do.
For women whose culture or religion say no physical contact with men you are not married to forcing them to shake hands with a man other than their husband is as much a physical violation as putting an object in their vagina. What’s so controversal about that? Anyway, what I actually said was any man who had a problem with a woman not wanting to shake his hand had boundary issues and that I personally would consider him more capable of rape than a man who respects a woman’s right not to be touched. Once again, what’s so controversal about that?
The thread about offering a handshake is disrespectful to women and a man who does it is probably a sexual predator starts here, and goes off the rails before the first page.
One of my faves was her assertion that adopted people have an obligation to make their adopted status public, in case they encounter anyone who has a religious proscription against contact with a person who is ritually unclean.
And no, I’m not kidding.
More or less for most of my life, I have had to defend myself from anti-Roma persecution.
Not on this board you haven’t.
You said you felt women who go around shaking hands are clearly whores.
Almost certain it was Allesan.
Good call.
Do you think she is serious? She says she is Roma.
I figured I didn’t often say the word “zealot” in the pit, and I was right.
Here is some conversation about the craziness.
It takes two to make a child, it should take two to decide if the child is born. Seriously, I can’t understand how you believe it’s acceptable for one parent to be able to make decision to have a child, especially when the non-consenting parent could have their lives and the lives of all their family members ruined by the birth of an unwanted child. You are literally willing to destroy the lives of dozens of already born, productive, contributing people so that one baby who potential is a complete unknown can be born. That is a completely bizarre allocation of resources.
Seriously, if it weren’t for adoption, animal videos on youtube would be like…20% less cute.
Actually, I think it was sluts. I actually have a lot of respect for whores who honestly charge money for sexual acts rather than give it away for free. The problem with women who go around shaking hands is that most of them are bootlickers (if not something else) that won’t stand up for their other sisters’ rights not to have men touch them unless they consent.
Man, what did irony do to deserve that?
See? You just have to let it talk…
I wish people would quit it with the armchair diagnoses of disorders.
Just say you think she’s a poopyhead.
Otara
Why not? It’s simple honesty and if it prevents causing someone embarassment or worse great guilt for having violated their religious tenets common courtesy would be to disclose. It’s no different then when I have guests for dinner or bring food to a potluck at work, I am always careful to label dishes that contain pork, meat, gluten whatever, so that no one violates their food beliefs. Besides if adoption is nothing to be ashamed of why do you care who knows it?