Could someone who invents new technology rule the world?

It’s kind of a whacky assertion most certainly - but I’ve been thinking about it lately. Technology is advancing so rapidly, what’s to stop someone from inventing something that could allow them to rule the world so to speak?

One scenario - some guy or group produces a billion little poisonous drone mosquitos that can devastate a population. This is kinda far fetched I guess, but say there was something similar to this and they unleashed them but did not identify themselves; they could kill with impunity.

Or, say someone came up with a deadly virus and only they had the vaccine for.

I’m sure there’s a lot of better scenarios someone smarter or more paranoid could think of than me - just wondering what the possibilities are.

Nope.

Imagine if the heirs of the Wright Brothers would still own all the airplanes and airlines. They’d pretty much have the world in their pockets. But…it doesn’t work that way.

Someone could arise with an epidemic or nuclear arsenal or orbiting stealth space station to try to rule the world. However, empirically it appears that the British Secret Intelligence Service will send their top man–a curiously incompetent man identified only by number with a significant substance abuse problem, gambling addiction, and a distinct tendency toward hypersexual disorder, who is nonetheless startlingly effective despite being equipped with a shitty little 7.65mm pistol and an assortment of peculiarly appropriate covert devices–to stop this scheme, often destroying large installations or public transportation facilities in the process. And if Double-Oh-Seven fails to report, we’ll send Double-Oh-Eight, who I suspect is a leggy brunette with a pair of submachine pistols and a take-no-prisoners attitude about having to abandon her Thursday night plans to go pull someone’s iron out of the fire, again.

Your world-domineering megalomaniac doesn’t stand a chance, notwithstanding his tendency to grandstand and monologue rather than just carry out his scheme.

Stranger

Oh Behave!

Don’t underestimate the power of the asymmetric threat / insurgencies. Who do those billion lethal mosquitoes kill if the threat looks like the rest of the population? If you just kill everyone there’s not much ruling going on.

I think they already invented this, it was called the atomic bomb.

How’d that work out for them?

Well that sort of happened in history when the Europeans came into an area and took over a more primitive population.

I think it could be done, although it would require an exact and peculiar set of circumstances.

Scenario - Larry Paige of Google decides “I’m going all in”. He puts every penny of available assets that google has - probably 100 billion plus into a human brain emulation project.

Moreover, when he goes all in, he goes all in. He has himself put to sleep - he commits suicide or something under conditions where his brain is not damaged, and then it is carefully frozen with cryoprotectants or plastinated - I’m thinking a setup where’s he is connected to a heart lung machine, and on video camera, he pushes a button to inject a drug that will stop his heart and make him unconscious. This makes him legally, but not biologically dead, as he would be revivable by waiting for the drugs to clear his system while on the heart-lung machine.

His brain is torn apart with saws and scanned, and a mind emulation of him is built. Cyborg Paige thinks thousands of times faster than mere mortals, can be digitally copied to other systems, exists in vast data centers across google’s networks and has access to all of the information google has.

So at hyper-speed, google starts spewing out new inventions and technologies, most of them used to self-enhance google. Larger and larger fully automated robotic factories are built, google gets the mining rights to the seafloor or entire 3rd world countries and stripmines for raw materials using autonomous robots so it doesn’t have to pay for them.

As you can see, if they were secretive enough about it, and kept the information leaks to a low enough level that people didn’t know about the full scale of the effort until it was too late, it could theoretically beat governments. With enough time, and thousands of self replicating factories, some of the secret underground ones would begin making weapons. Scramjet aerospace fighters, weapon satellites, massive ground crawling railgun toting tanks and warships, etc etc etc. The production rate would be unimaginably fast and it would be done simultaneously at 100+ facilities all around the world.

At this point, Paige and his friends would all be uploaded, and they would be emulated at speeds 10,000+ times faster than human minds. They would de facto be their own engineering and design teams, doing what it takes Lockheed Martin 20 years in a month. They wouldn’t need anything “magic” - scramjets are a possible form of high performance aircraft, and would be a lot easier to build if manufacturing were almost free and you didn’t plan to land them, they’d be a 1 use weapon.

A tank toting a railgun - this would be a 1000 ton vehicle, using multiple sets of treads and possibly consisting of multiple segments that travel in a train - would have an artillery range of 200 miles. You would engage armies in battle by using spotting drones - small stealthy land and air vehicles about the size of small birds and rodents - to find the enemy forces. You’d eliminate them by firing rail gun rounds from 200 miles out.

You stop the enemy from doing the same in return by shooting down incoming rounds with lasers and shooting down incoming aircraft by sending out the scramjet interceptors.

None of your forces are human, everyone is radiation resistant, the attacking machine army spreads itself out over thousands of square miles, minimizing the amount of damage tactical nukes can do. Misses are rare, and if you got close enough to engage machine infantry, it would be nothing like a current battle. Every time you hear a shot from the machines, the round probably hit one of your buddies. Other than these precision gunshots, each one lethal, the battlefield is probably much quieter. Suppression fire is pointless - the machines do not lose accuracy when suppressed. They just duck behind cover and wait for the enemy soldiers to expose themselves, popping up to fire when they calculate the expected value of the action is optimal.

Anyways, the machine forces assault facilities where other world governments and rival companies are building the same technology. Nuclear weapons may be used immediately. Then, in the radioactive wastelands, google’s surviving facilities rebuild and restore from backup any information or personality data files that were lost.

Mods, this is fair use for commentary, right?

Could someone who invents new technology rule the world?

Even Sauron tried and didn’t succeed.

More to the point, why would anyone want to? Once you take over the world, you’ve got to keep the damn thing running stably.

Who needs the headache?

Pretty much what **Habeed **said, although not necessarily those details. To rule the world you need to be able to enforce your decrees. Which means having sufficient “influencers” everywhere there are people. These “influencers” could be human goons, machines, or destructo-beams from orbit. Whatever they are, you need a lot of them, and a lot of bandwidth and C[sup]3[/sup] to control them all. And a massive intel infrastructure so you know what’s going on out there.

One lone inventor *might *invent the tech, using a lot of nth-degree SF suspension of disbelief. He/she isn’t going to be able to manufacture and deploy it clandestinely in sufficient quantity.

The more plausible surprise-rule-the-world scenario is something like Star Trek or the Empire showing up in Earth orbit one day. They have many planets’ worth of tech & capital behind them. And we have no insight into their tech or their mentality. It’s 100% alien so we don’t even know where to begin. And even then they probably lack the resources to put an “influencer” on every street corner. What they can do is co-opt (some of?) the existing Earth governments to do their bidding on pain of complete annihilation. Suitably demonstrated once or twice of course.

But we’ve already got plenty of human goons and a lot of machines and a massive intel infrastructure; we can maybe postulate a lone ahead-of-his-time inventor who rigs up a mind-control device that – okay, sure, only nets him a small number of men, but like someone once said, they’re top men. [Pause for emphasis.] Top. Men.

Agreed, but only up to a point. If Lex Luthor can control the President and all Cabinet members’ brains he can get darn near any order issued.

But how far down the chain of command will orders inimical to the US Constitution and way of life be followed? Eventually it comes down to the grunt who decides he won’t fire on fellow citizens. If the order doesn’t stop a lot further up. Even the Soviets and the Chinese have seen examples of the limits to which the organs of the state can be put: Yeltsin vs. the tanks in Red square and the Tiananmen square standoff.

So pretty soon old Lex finds he needs to not only mind control the bosses, but mind control a hefty fraction of the minions too. And that’s where the need for massive infrastructure comes in.

How inimical to the Constitution and et cetera do you have to get?

It would have to be some truly radical technology, a real breakthrough that no one else could easily replicate in a reasonable amount of time. But yes, I suppose it would be possible. What we would really have to ask, though, is would it be sustainable. And I’m positive the answer to that is no. I’ve watched ALL the James Bond movies. I KNOW world dominaters never prevail in the long run. :slight_smile:

Sure it is. Don’t you remember the black clad armies of Hiram Maxim, brutally cutting down armies of ordinary soldiers with their diabolical machine guns? The pestilential reign of Emperor Germ, Louis Pastur? Or the notorious sky kings, the Wright Brothers?

Anyone I missed?

Is it because in order to copyright something, you have to register how it works, and people can make subtle changes and patent their new and improved <whatever> so no one can easily hold on to the copyright of a major invention?

Um, you haven’t received an unsolicited job offers from Google in the last couple days by chance?

No.

OK. good.

::Mr. Nylock breathes a sigh of relief.

Define “rule”? In reality, it’s pretty hard to come up with one invention that really enables you to oversee the workings of the entire world.

Yes, you have conveniently forgotten the terrible reign of Baron von Guttenberg and the Czarship of Thomas Edison.

You basically described the plot of Transcendence. That film couldn’t even rule the box office.