I don’t see the lie or the cheat (in the creationist account).
With post #16
You really don’t have anything, do you? Please understand that I am not defending Ken Ham at all, nor am I criticizing atheists in general. But you buddy…
I don’t think I like.
You posted eleven paragraphs written by this idiot, and you can’t even come up with one? Your entire rebuttal to this guy is “squeal, squeal”. What the fuck is that? Write something. Tell me why this guy offended you so much. This is your thread, so tell me why I should make fun of him instead of you.
It would be something new for a change
May we introduce you to the Quote button, thereby making these little exchanges unnecessary?
On my screen, it’s in the lower right corner of every post. It allows you to do what I did in this post, which is to quote the post you are responding to.
You are either dim or purposely annoying. Stop it.
Roddy
With my post? What part of it do you disagree with, exactly?
All of it
A masterdebater if I’ve ever seen one.
You think Ken Ham is an honest man?
Would you like to buy a bridge?
I still think he is great
I disagree with post #27
If the fucker can’t explain himself, I’d quit engaging him. How hard is it to quote someone or say what you take issue with? That whole style of posting is just to goad people into begging him to explain. Quit it.
All of it?
I disagree with post #34.
What about post #11? It seems perfectly plausible to me; Susan was probably hoping to make a convert, not knowing that she was doomed to fail.
I predict post 81 will be rife with sin and heresy.
But seriously, 29 bucks?! Eighth commandment, buddy.
Ken Ham appreciates your credulity, I’m sure.
Hi, Ken!
I think post #17 is full of shit.
I’ll show YOU people! I disagree with every post on this board, ever. Including from the AOL days. Including mine, though I missed the AOL days. Including every letter and email ever written to Cecil, especially the ones that were never sent. And every last one of Cecil’s replies. Beat that, bitches.