Whoa-Christian Kink!
(I have to confess, though, the chemises and drawers ARE pretty cute. I’d totally wear the chemise as a nightgown-I LOVE vintage-y stuff like that)
I am too afraid to click on the link.
Pre-emptive spanking? Pre-emptive spanking?!
Tell me that there aren’t a lot of these people.
I have to admit that I didn’t venture into the porn section. Maybe there is a God, after all.
The MAN of the house never gets spanked, you heathen. Good lord. Next thing you’ll be asking is “When does he do the dishes?” :rolleyes: 
The first one has the type of garments that Sensibility would have patterns for and such. The rest of the site…well, let’s just say it’s uh, “interesting”.
The site says as much:
In other words: since the law says that nonconsenual beatings are illegal, we will pretend that we don’t advocate that. But, really, we know what is going on here.
Heh - usually it’ smy mind in the gutter, but you caught me this time. I didn’t even mean that one.
Well, I figured. But what skeeves me is that spanking a wife is supposed to cure her “attitude”, except that in that case, it leads to sex. So if Dad gets off on spanking Mom, what happens when he spanks his nineteen y/o daughter? Or, for that matter, his son?
I think you’re reading too much into it Rilchiam. Don’t get me wrong, this stuff is deeply disturbed (IMO, it’s a really cunning way for hard-line mysogynistic fundies to lure in people who would otherwise turn away because of their “deviant” sexual preferences), but I don’t think there’s anything weird about drawing a distinction between spanking a spouse and spanking a child.
Spanking a romantic partner has all kinds of sexual connotations, but people spank little children everyday without any kind of perverted intent or undertone. Now, spanking the 19-year old daughter is more than a little bizarre, but still. I don’t think the average person would have the same emotional experience for these two situations where the difference, however subtle, is vast.
I dunno, I just found your train of thought kind of odd. Of all the eyebrow-raising things from this site, I never even gave that particular aspect a second thought.
I’m all for the kink if that’s what people want to do. I don’t understand pretending that this is all part of god’s mysterious plan. Why did “god” make it necessary for men (and you KNOW they aren’t thinking there are any femme dommes doing the spanking on their wayward husbands) to have to discipline their wives anyway? Why didn’t god just make those naughty ladies behave in the first place?
These people are into bdsm. Why don’t they just say so. Everything they advocate can be found, without the religious references, on any bdsm site.
I’m finding it hilarious and positively freaky at the same time. It’s amazing how people will use religion to justify their base desires.
Edit: check out the guestbook - this post wins:
This is as disturbing to me as when Random House removed “gullibility” from the dictionary because it was considered offensive to the mentally handicapped.
C’mon, it’s very obvious what’s happening here. Ever since the Southern Baptist Convention officially came out with that shit about the wife having to be submissive to her husband, this kind of stuff has been kind of inevitable. The existence of such a position naturally would tend to attact those who are into various kinds of dominance/submission behavior, and to bring out such behavior in any who were inclined to it. It’s exactly like the way the Catholic belief in preistly celibacy has attracted people who are prone to deny their sexuality, frex, people who are gay or pederasts, and who are disturbed about it, and also it brings out homosexual and pederastic tendencies (as well as SM tendencies) because more normal sexual outlets are denied.
The fundies are headed for major perviness because of their doctrine that wives must be submissive to their husbands. This is just the beginning. Look for some juicy scandals down the road.
You can be sure that there will eventually be pics/vids, distributed as a form of “witnessing.” Say Hallelujah!"
You guys didn’t see the book cover?! (reuploaded to my web space for convenience) Now THAT’s disturbing.
(though you can’t tell it from the public URL, that picture was assigned the ID number 666… hmmm…)
Well, this is a way of making it more socially acceptable. To a lot of folks, “BDSM” = “pervert”. If you’re a religious person, and your pastor finds out you have a kinky BDSM site, it probably won’t go over well at the next church social event, but if you frame it in the context of some sort of spiritual thing within the bounds of marriage, you might be able to justify it to other Christians.
Personally, I don’t really see the appeal of spanking fetishes, so any sort of site about spanking fetishes will just kind of make me go “huh?”. But a lot of people do like that kind of stuff for whatever reason, and a lot of people do like Christianity, so it doesn’t really surprise me that there is some overlap between the two groups.
Well, you know what they say: Why hide your light under a ball gag?
Cite?
Liberal would never say a thing like that if it weren’t true.
Actually, if you check any dictionary published in the last ten years you will find that “gullibility” has been removed for the sake of political correctness toward the mentally handicapped…
AND you’ll also find that, if you look up right now, it’s written on the ceiling!
I think you’re right. But as I noted above the guys who want to be spanked are still shit out of luck.
bete “pervert” noir