Well, in the 19th century, when pantaloons for women were introduced, crotchless was the only choice, at least at first.
Not necessarily; aren’t Christians supposed to do unto others as they would have others do unto them or something like that?
WWJS - Who Would Jesus Spank?
I just got the MOST sacrilegious mental image of Pontius Pilate with a cat-o-nine tails, whispering into Jesus’ ear: “Who’s your daddy? Hmmm? Who’s your daddy, bitch?” :eek:
“Do unto others as makes them moist and gaspy.”
That is just BEGGING to be a new sig line!
Not at all CDD of you Anaamika. 
Oh man… I was so close to getting up and walking over to my dictionary… :smack:
Somehow even the oldest ones keep on working…
Well, I walked over to 2 online dictionaries. It’s there.
M-W.com had a def for gullible, and dictionary.com had this for gullibility:
**The term gullibility refers to the state of being easily deceived. Someone who fits into this category is said to be gullible. There are several causes of gullibility. The person may be naive, have some form of learning difficulty or may display gullibility as a result of wishful thinking.
**
Am I being whooshed? (I haven’t read the entire thread.)
How do Mormon diapers fit into this? Can they play too, or are they not Xtian.
Yes. And let that be a lesson to you: Read the whole thread.
Exactly how I feel. The double standard pisses me off no end. The smug arrogance implicit in the assumption that “The MAN knows best” is just too much.
If it were simply one particular couples idea of role-playing, I wouldn’t mind so much. But they’re trying to sell abusive misogyny as a legitimate spiritual lifestyle, endorsed by Gawd (who speaks English).
Well, I was going to come into this thread and say that they’ve turned something hot and fun into something offensive and patronizing. But, then, I’m a bird-brained female and I have no husband to check with to see if my opinion is OK, so I guess I’ll just ask: any Christian men want to spank some sense into me? flutters eyelashes
Not at all. I am totally serious.
Check a printed dictionary.
Oh? See the post above.
If you have to read the whole post to know if you are being whooshed here, there is no hope…
I hope you’re joking BarnOwl, and that I’m the one getting wooshed by you.
Crap!! You said any dictionary published in the last 10 years.
Online dictionaries have been published in the last 10 years. You’re excluding them because they don’t suit your argument.
If a Merriam-Webster dictionary deleted the G word in the printed edition, what would be the point of including it in the online version?
You rode the short bus to school, didn’t you?
Mormons don’t have “diapers”. The have The Garment. I understand that originally these extended to the wrists and ankles, like long underwear, but the current version is more abbreviated, going to lower thigh and partway down the arm – like longer versions of boxers and T-shirts. They have some characteristic holes and features, as well, and it’s all very symbolic. If you work at it, you can find very detailed descriptions by ex-Mormons. I’ve seen plenty of the male version in locker rooms in Utah.
None of this is related to CDD at all. But, in my experience, LDS folk are very sexy people within their own marriages. It wouldn’t surprise me if some were playing light B&D games.