Not much comment on this one. Just thought y’all might like to read about this study:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/health/2004324032_survey03.html
which reminds me - what ever happened to DantheMan? did we lose him when we went pay-to-post? I always liked his posts.
Eeek. I did not know of this poster.
I had a good 3 to 13 minutes this morning. Certainly makes the day start off a bit better. 
See, this is why they need to sell egg timers in pairs.
The good news is that I had 20.
The bad news is that I was alone.
I would say that the findings are bullshit, but I know the doctor who did the study, and he knows what he’s doing.
Three minutes is inconceivable to me, though.
Quality, not quantity.
Didn’t they teach you that in school?
Don’t worry. I’m sure with practice you can work up to three minutes.
Also, remember that time doesn’t include foreplay. A good long time might be spent on that, with the actual intercourse just being the grande finale.
[my bolding]
Obviously he knows what he’s doing if he can get the job done in three minutes.
You are to be complimented on your choice of word.
Someday maybe.
Actually, sometimes it’s just pushups.
Bravo.
Og was watching. :eek:
Know him? Like, biblically? 
Actually, I have to wonder how relevant this is? It is a survey of sex therapists, not sexually active couples. It is a questionnaire, apparently with no experimental results to back up anything. Nothing about whether a man who orgasms in 3 minutes has a less or more satisfied partner than one who takes 13.
First 3 minutes: Orgasm
Next 7 minutes: Nap
Last 3 minutes: Orgasm
I can’t think of a better morning.
So was Ceiling Cat.